Abstract

Key Messages•The beneficial effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol with statin therapy apply equally well to people with diabetes as to those without the disease.•The primary treatment goal for people with diabetes is LDL-cholesterol consistently <2.0 mmol/L or >50% reduction from baseline. Alternative targets and goals are non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol <2.6 mmol/L or apolipoprotein B <0.8 g/L. Achievement of the primary goal may require intensification of healthy behaviour interventions with statin monotherapy. On occasion, the addition of other lipid-lowering medications may be required.Key Messages for People with Diabetes•Most adults with diabetes are at greater risk for cardiovascular diseases, such as heart attack and stroke.•People with diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases even if their LDL-cholesterol is “normal”. They have an even higher risk if their LDL-cholesterol is elevated.•Adults with diabetes should have their cholesterol tested yearly or as indicated by your health-care provider. More frequent testing may be necessary for people taking cholesterol medications.•Always discuss your cholesterol results with your physician or nurse practitioner and other members of your health-care team. •The beneficial effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol with statin therapy apply equally well to people with diabetes as to those without the disease.•The primary treatment goal for people with diabetes is LDL-cholesterol consistently <2.0 mmol/L or >50% reduction from baseline. Alternative targets and goals are non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol <2.6 mmol/L or apolipoprotein B <0.8 g/L. Achievement of the primary goal may require intensification of healthy behaviour interventions with statin monotherapy. On occasion, the addition of other lipid-lowering medications may be required. •Most adults with diabetes are at greater risk for cardiovascular diseases, such as heart attack and stroke.•People with diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases even if their LDL-cholesterol is “normal”. They have an even higher risk if their LDL-cholesterol is elevated.•Adults with diabetes should have their cholesterol tested yearly or as indicated by your health-care provider. More frequent testing may be necessary for people taking cholesterol medications.•Always discuss your cholesterol results with your physician or nurse practitioner and other members of your health-care team. Diabetes is associated with a high risk of vascular disease (i.e. 2- to 4-fold greater risk than that of individuals without diabetes). In fact, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (1Roglic G. Unwin N. Bennett P.H. et al.The burden of mortality attributable to diabetes: Realistic estimates for the year 2000.Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 2130-2135Crossref PubMed Scopus (560) Google Scholar, 2Morrish N.J. Wang S.L. Stevens L.K. et al.Mortality and causes of death in the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes.Diabetologia. 2001; 44: S14-S21Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 3Booth G.L. Rothwell D. Kung F. et al.Diabetes and cardiac disease.in: Hux J.E. Booth G.L. Laupacis A. An ICES practice atlas: Institute for clinical evaluative sciences, diabetes in Ontario. 2003: 95-129Google Scholar). Aggressive management of all CVD risk factors, including dyslipidemia, is, therefore, generally necessary in individuals with diabetes (4Gaede P. Vedel P. Larsen N. et al.Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 383-393Crossref PubMed Scopus (3248) Google Scholar, 5Bittner V. Bertolet M. Barraza Felix R. et al.Comprehensive cardiovascular risk factor control improves survival: The BARI 2D trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 765-773Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 6Margolis K.L. O'Connor P.J. Morgan T.M. et al.Outcomes of combined cardiovascular risk factor management strategies in type 2 diabetes: The ACCORD randomized trial.Diabetes Care. 2014; 37: 1721-1728Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). The most common lipid pattern in people with type 2 diabetes consists of hypertriglyceridemia (hyper-TG), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and relatively normal plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, in the presence of even mild hyper-TG, LDL-C particles are typically small and dense and may be more susceptible to oxidation. In addition, chronic hyperglycemia promotes the glycation of LDL-C, and both glycation and oxidation are believed to increase the atherogenicity of LDL-C. Both of these processes may impair function and/or enhance atherogenicity even in those with type 1 diabetes with a normal lipid profile. The risk imparted by this lipid profile, even when LDL-C is considered low, remains quite substantial (7Rana J.S. Liu J.Y. Moffet H.H. et al.Metabolic dyslipidemia and risk of coronary heart disease in 28,318 adults with diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl.Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116: 1700-1704Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Table 1 lists the components of dyslipidemia associated with diabetes (8Fruchart J.C. Sacks F.M. Hermans M.P. et al.The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative: A call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in dyslipidaemic patient.Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008; 5: 319-335Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 9Parhofer K.G. Pathophysiology of diabetic dyslipidemia: Implications for atherogenesis and treatment.Clin Lipidol. 2011; 6: 401-411Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar). Many of these abnormalities also are seen in people with metabolic syndrome (10Leiter L.A. Fitchett D.H. et al.Cardiometabolic Risk Working Group: Executive CommitteeCardiometabolic risk in Canada: A detailed analysis and position paper by the cardiometabolic risk working group.Can J Cardiol. 2011; 27: e1-33Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar, 11Ginsberg H.N. MacCallum P.R. The obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus pandemic: Part I. Increased cardiovascular disease risk and the importance of atherogenic dyslipidemia in persons with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus.J Cardiometab Syndr. 2009; 4: 113-119Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar).Table 1Dyslipidemia components associated with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome*Adapted from reference 8.•Increased TG and TG-rich lipoproteins•Increased postprandial TG•Low HDL-C•Low apo A-I•Decreased small HDL, prebeta-1 HDL, alpha-3 HDL•Increased apo B•Increased LDL particle number•Increased small, dense LDL•Increased apo C-III•Increased non-HDL-C•Increased oxidized and glycated lipidsApo, apolipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.* Adapted from reference 8Fruchart J.C. Sacks F.M. Hermans M.P. et al.The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative: A call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in dyslipidaemic patient.Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008; 5: 319-335Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar. Open table in a new tab Apo, apolipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride. A detailed overview of risk assessment to guide decisions in whom to use statin therapy is provided in the Cardiovascular Protection in People with Diabetes chapter, p. S162. Principles of risk assessment also are discussed in the 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia (12Anderson T.J. Gregoire J. Hegele R.A. et al.2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.Can J Cardiol. 2013; 29: 151-167Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar, 13Anderson T.J. Grégoire J. Pearson G.J. et al.2016 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.Can J Cardiol. 2016; 32: 1263-1282Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), and efforts were made to ensure consistency between the guidelines. Accordingly, actual risk calculation is not required in most cases as people with diabetes >40 years of age, or >30 years of age and duration of diabetes >15 years or with concomitant microvascular or cardiovascular (CV) disease warrant therapy (13Anderson T.J. Grégoire J. Pearson G.J. et al.2016 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.Can J Cardiol. 2016; 32: 1263-1282Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The burden of dyslipidemia is high in people with diabetes. A national cross-sectional chart audit study of 2,473 Canadians with type 2 diabetes revealed that 55% of individuals with a diabetes diagnosis of 2 years' duration also had dyslipidemia. This proportion rose to 66% in those with diabetes for 15 years (14Harris S.B. Ekoe J.M. Zdanowicz Y. et al.Glycemic control and morbidity in the Canadian primary care setting (results of the diabetes in Canada evaluation study).Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005; 70: 90-97Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar). Therefore, a fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], HDL-C, TG and calculated LDL-C) should be conducted at the time of diagnosis of diabetes and if treatment is not warranted, the assessment should be repeated annually or as clinically indicated. If treatment for dyslipidemia is initiated, more frequent testing is warranted. A fast of >8 hours may be inappropriate for individuals with diabetes, especially if long-acting basal insulin is part of their treatment regimen. Although nonfasting LDL-C is generally valid unless TG is elevated, non-HDL-C (defined as TC minus HDL-C) or apolipoprotein B (apo B) measurements (see below) are also valid even in the nonfasting state and even if the TG level is not normal. Indeed, the most recent CCS guidelines for management of dyslipidemia now endorse the option of nonfasting lipid measurements more broadly, not solely in people with diabetes, unless the person is known to have abnormalities of TG. Laboratories will not report LDL-C when TG is ≥4.5 mmol/L. In people known to have this level of hypertriglyceridemia, a fasting profile should be performed but non-HDL-C or apo B may still need to be used to determine atherogenicity of the dyslipidemia in this circumstance as well (13Anderson T.J. Grégoire J. Pearson G.J. et al.2016 Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.Can J Cardiol. 2016; 32: 1263-1282Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). For screening in children and adolescents, please refer to the chapters dedicated to diabetes in these groups (Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents chapter, p. S234; Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents chapter, p.S247). Healthy behaviour interventions remain a key component of CVD prevention strategies and of diabetes management in general. Achievement of healthy weight and aerobic activity level, adoption of an energy-restricted, compositionally well-balanced diet that is low in cholesterol, saturated and trans fatty acids and refined carbohydrates, inclusion of viscous fibres, plant sterols, nuts and soy proteins, use of alcohol in moderation and smoking cessation all are fundamental considerations to improve glycemic control, the overall lipid profile and, most importantly, to reduce CVD risk (15Alberti K.G. Eckel R.H. Grundy S.M. et al.Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity.Circulation. 2009; 120: 1640-1645Crossref PubMed Scopus (5188) Google Scholar, 16Dattilo A.M. Kris-Etherton P.M. Effects of weight reduction on blood lipids and lipoproteins: A meta-analysis.Am J Clin Nutr. 1992; 56: 320-328Crossref PubMed Scopus (786) Google Scholar, 17Wing R.R. Lang W. Wadden T.A. et al.Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: 1481-1486Crossref PubMed Scopus (484) Google Scholar, 18Kendall C.W. Jenkins D.J. A dietary portfolio: Maximal reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with diet.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004; 6: 492-498Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 19Jenkins D.J. Kendall C.W. Faulkner D.A. et al.Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia.Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83: 582-591Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 20Wing R.R. Weight loss in the management of type 2 diabetes.in: Gerstein H.C. Haynes R.B. Evidence-based diabetes care. BC Decker Inc., Hamilton2001: 252-276Google Scholar, 21Boulé N.G. Haddad E. Kenny G.P. et al.Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.JAMA. 2001; 286: 1218-1227Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 22Moy C.S. Songer T.J. LaPorte R.E. et al.Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, physical activity, and death.Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 137: 74-81Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar, 23Hu F.B. Stampfer M.J. Solomon C.G. et al.The impact of diabetes mellitus on mortality from all causes and coronary heart disease in women: 20 years of follow-up.Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161: 1717-1723Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 24Wei M. Gibbons L.W. Kampert J.B. et al.Low cardiorespiratory fitness and physical inactivity as predictors of mortality in men with type 2 diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 605-611Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 25Warburton D.E.R. Nicol C.W. Bredin S.S.D. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence.Can Med Assoc J. 2006; 174: 801-809Crossref PubMed Scopus (2604) Google Scholar, 26Church T.S. Cheng Y.J. Earnest C.P. et al.Exercise capacity and body composition as predictors of mortality among men with diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 83-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (288) Google Scholar). Each of these is discussed in more detail in accompanying chapters (Physical Activity and Diabetes chapter, p. S54; Nutrition Therapy chapter, p. S64; Weight Management in Diabetes chapter, p. S124). A number of studies and meta-analyses have shown that the degree of LDL-C lowering with statins and the beneficial effects of lowering LDL-C apply equally well to people with and without diabetes (27Pyŏrälä K. Pedersen T.R. Kjekshus J. et al.Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S).Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 614-620Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 28Sacks F.M. Pfeffer M.A. Moye L.A. et al.The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1001-1009Crossref PubMed Scopus (6723) Google Scholar, 29The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study GroupPrevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group.N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1349-1357Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 30Collins R. Armitage J. Parish S. et al.MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2003; 361: 2005-2016Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 31Heart Protection Study Collaborative GroupMRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2002; 360: 7-22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6487) Google Scholar, 32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar, 33LaRosa J.C. Grundy S.M. Waters D.D. et al.Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease.N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1425-1435Crossref PubMed Scopus (2524) Google Scholar, 34Shepherd J. Barter P. Carmena R. et al.Effect of lowering LDL cholesterol substantially below currently recommended levels in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes: The Treating to New Targets (TNT) study.Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 1220-1226Crossref PubMed Scopus (377) Google Scholar, 35Costa J. Borges M. David C. et al.Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ. 2006; 332: 1115-1124Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 36Tkáč I. Treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: Overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007; 78: S23-S28Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 37Brugts J.J. Yetgin T. Hoeks S.E. et al.The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ. 2009; 338: b2376Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 38Leiter L.A. Betteridge D.J. Farnier M. et al.Lipid-altering efficacy and safety profile of combination therapy with ezetimibe/statin vs. statin monotherapy in patients with and without diabetes: An analysis of pooled data from 27 clinical trials.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011; 13: 615-628Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar). Large trials have demonstrated the benefits of statin therapy in both the primary and secondary prevention of CVD, and subgroup analyses of these studies have shown similar benefits in subsets of participants with diabetes (28Sacks F.M. Pfeffer M.A. Moye L.A. et al.The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1001-1009Crossref PubMed Scopus (6723) Google Scholar, 29The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study GroupPrevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group.N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1349-1357Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 30Collins R. Armitage J. Parish S. et al.MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2003; 361: 2005-2016Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 39Cannon C.P. Blazing M.A. Giugliano R.P. et al.Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes.N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 2387-2397Crossref PubMed Scopus (1112) Google Scholar). Across all subgroups, statin therapy provides the same relative risk reduction in terms of outcomes, but the absolute benefit depends on the baseline level of absolute risk, which is typically increased in people with diabetes. Subgroup analyses from statin trials also have shown similar relative benefits of LDL-C lowering, regardless of baseline LDL-C (30Collins R. Armitage J. Parish S. et al.MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2003; 361: 2005-2016Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar). Intensive-dose statin has been demonstrated to improve outcome compared to moderate-dose statins, even in older people with MI or in people on dialysis (40de Vries F.M. Kolthof J. Postma M.J. et al.Efficacy of standard and intensive statin treatment for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in diabetes patients: A meta-analysis.PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e111247Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 41Li L. Ambegaonkar B.M. Reckless J.P. et al.Association of a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with incident cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 21: 855-865Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar, 42Ko D.T. Wijeysundera H.C. Jackevicius C.A. et al.Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular events in older patients with myocardial infarction prescribed intensive-dose and moderate-dose statins.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013; 6: 315-322Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 43Yang M. Xie X.S. Yuan W.J. A meta-analysis of the effects of statin treatment on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in diabetic dialysis patients.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 8415-8424PubMed Google Scholar). Therefore, statin use should be considered for any person with diabetes at risk of a CV event. In the very small group of lower-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes, the relative reduction in CVD risk with statin therapy is likely to be similar to that seen in those at higher global risk for CVD, but the absolute benefit from statin therapy is predicted to be smaller. However, the global CVD risk of these individuals is lifelong, will increase with age and may be worsened in the presence of additional CV risk factors. Therefore, repeated monitoring of the CVD risk status of people with diabetes (as outlined in the screening section above) is recommended. The results of the Heart Protection Study (HPS), which compared simvastatin 40 mg daily to placebo, provide considerable insight into the importance of LDL-C lowering in the general population and, in particular, among people with diabetes (31Heart Protection Study Collaborative GroupMRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2002; 360: 7-22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6487) Google Scholar). In the overall study, involving >20,000 participants, similar risk-ratio reductions were observed in participants with baseline LDL-C >3.5 mmol/L, 3.0 to 3.5 mmol/L and <3.0 mmol/L. In the subgroup with diabetes (n=5,963, including 615 people with type 1 diabetes), treatment with 40 mg simvastatin daily resulted in a 27% reduction in CV events and a 25% reduction in stroke relative to treatment with placebo. The risk reduction was similar in the cohorts with and without diabetes, and the treatment benefit was independent of baseline HDL-C and LDL-C levels (LDL-C <3.0 mmol/L or ≥3.0 mmol/L), sex, vascular disease, type of diabetes (type 1 vs. type 2) and A1C level (30Collins R. Armitage J. Parish S. et al.MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2003; 361: 2005-2016Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar). These results emphasized the benefits of statin treatment irrespective of the pre-existing serum LDL-C level. The Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) was the first completed statin trial to be conducted exclusively in people with type 2 diabetes without known CVD (32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar). The mean baseline LDL-C of the study population was 3.1 mmol/L, and all participants had at least 1 CVD risk factor in addition to diabetes. CARDS demonstrated that treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg daily was safe and highly efficacious in reducing the risk of a first CV event, including stroke. Treatment resulted in a mean LDL-C of 2.0 mmol/L and was associated with a reduced risk for CV events and stroke of 37% and 48%, respectively. These study findings support the value of treating even so-called “normal” LDL-C levels in people with type 2 diabetes and no known CVD. This concept is concordant with a recent analysis of CVD risk in adults with diabetes and LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (7Rana J.S. Liu J.Y. Moffet H.H. et al.Metabolic dyslipidemia and risk of coronary heart disease in 28,318 adults with diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl.Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116: 1700-1704Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). As mentioned previously, all CARDS subjects had at least 1 additional CVD risk factor (i.e. history of hypertension, retinopathy, microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria, or current smoking), a profile that applies to an estimated 70% to 80% of people with type 2 diabetes (32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar, 44Evans J.M. Wang J. Morris A.D. Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: Cross sectional and cohort studies.BMJ. 2002; 324: 939-942Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Results from the United States (US) Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) indicate that 82% of people with diabetes and no clinically evident coronary artery disease (CAD) have at least 1 of the CARDS entry criteria risk factors (32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar). The CARDS investigators concluded that the study findings “challenge the use of a particular threshold level of LDL-C as the sole arbiter of which individuals with type 2 diabetes should receive statin therapy”. The absolute risk, determined by other risk factors in addition to LDL-C, should drive the target levels (32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar, 45Charlton-Menys V. Betteridge D.J. Colhoun H. et al.Targets of statin therapy: LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS).Clin Chem. 2009; 55: 473-480Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar). Indeed, the investigators questioned whether any individual with type 2 diabetes can be considered at sufficiently low risk for therapy to be withheld (32Colhoun H.M. Betteridge D.J. Durrington P.N. et al.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2004; 364: 685-696Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2743) Google Scholar). A sub-analysis of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) revealed similar benefits of atorvastatin 10 mg vs. placebo in people with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and at least 3 additional risk factors (46Sever P.S. Poulter N.R. Dahlof B. et al.Reduction in cardiovascular events with atorvastatin in 2,532 patients with type 2 diabetes: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA).Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 1151-1157Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar). The Atorvastatin Study for the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (ASPEN) assessed the effect of atorvastatin 10 mg daily vs. placebo on CVD prevention in 2,410 people with type 2 diabetes (47Knopp R.H. d'Emden M. Smilde J.G. et al.Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes: The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN).Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 1478-1485Crossref PubMed Scopus (332) Google Scholar). Although originally designed as a secondary prevention trial, the protocol underwent several changes, including the addition

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call