Abstract
AbstractPlate reconstruction studies show that the Neotethys Ocean was closing due to the convergence of Africa and Eurasia toward the end of the Cretaceous. The period around 75 Ma reflects the onset of continental collision between the two plates as convergence continued to be taken up mostly by subduction of the Neotethys slab beneath Eurasia. The Owen transform plate boundary in the northeast accommodated the fast northward motion of the Indian plate relative to the African plate. The rest of the plate was surrounded by mid‐ocean ridges. Africa was experiencing continent‐wide rifting related to northeast‐southwest extension. We aim to quantify the forces and paleostresses that may have driven this continental extension. We use the latest plate kinematic reconstructions in a grid search to estimate horizontal gravitational stresses (HGSs), plate boundary forces, and the plate's interaction with the asthenosphere. The contribution of dynamic topography to HGSs is based on recent mantle convection studies. We model intraplate stresses and compare them with the strain observations. The fit to observations favors models where dynamic topography amplitudes are smaller than 300 m. The results also indicate that the net pull transmitted from slab to the surface African plate was low. To put this into context, we notice that available tectonic reconstructions show fragmented subduction zones and various colliding micro‐continents along the northern margin of the African plate around this time. We therefore interpret a low net pull as resulting from either a small average slab length or from the micro‐continents' resistance to subduction.
Highlights
The dynamics of tectonic plates is governed by the balance of gravity and friction with surrounding plates and with the asthenosphere
The contribution of dynamic topography to horizontal gravitational stresses (HGSs) is based on recent mantle convection studies
The HGS and slab pull torques happen to be in roughly the same direction as the absolute plate motion, they are seen as driving the plate
Summary
The dynamics of tectonic plates is governed by the balance of gravity and friction with surrounding plates and with the asthenosphere. While models for gravitational forcing on plates, that is, slab pull and horizontal gravitational stresses (HGSs), can resolve the magnitudes relatively well (England & Wortel, 1980; Fleitout & Froidevaux, 1982; Frank, 1972; Meijer & Wortel, 1997; Nijholt et al, 2018; Richter & McKenzie, 1978; Wortel et al, 1991), quantification of resistive coupling between plates along different boundary types (Coblentz et al, 1998; Govers & Meijer, 2001; Humphreys & Coblentz, 2007; Van Benthem & Govers, 2010; Warners-Ruckstuhl et al, 2013), and of the tractions on the base of the lithosphere is not trivial (Conrad & Lithgow-Bertelloni, 2006; Flament et al, 2013; Forsyth & Uyeda, 1975; Molnar et al, 2015; Moucha & Forte, 2011; Phillips & Bunge, 2005; Van Summeren et al, 2012). Various studies of the evolution of the African plate have tried to link plate kinematic reconstructions directly to observations of tectonic activity (e.g., Guiraud & Bosworth, 1997; Guiraud et al, 2005; Janssen et al, 1995). We can constrain traction magnitudes by applying the basic assumption
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have