Abstract

This work aims to explore the dynamical well-killing process of a vertical H2S-containing natural gas well. A dynamical well-killing model considering an H2S solubility was established to simulate the overflow and well-killing process of a vertical H2S-containing natural gas well. The mass and momentum equations of the coupled model were solved using finite difference method, while the transient temperature prediction model was solved using finite volume method. The coupled model was validated by reproducing experimental data and field data of Well Tiandong #5. The effect of H2S content, mud displacement, drilling fluid density, and initial overflow volume on the dynamical well-killing process of an H2S-containing natural gas well were obtained and analyzed in this work. Results showed that H2S will gasify near wellhead during well killing when casing pressure decreases. To balance the bottom hole pressure, when H2S releases, the casing pressure increases as H2S content increases. As initial overflow volume increases, the annular temperature, annular pressure and the casing pressure increase significantly. When H2S gasifies, the casing pressure applied at wellhead should be higher at lower initial overflow volume to balance bottom hole pressure. In the well-killing process, the annular pressure and temperature decrease as drilling fluid density increases and a lower casing pressure is needed for balancing bottom hole pressure. The casing pressure is lower at a higher displacement for higher friction resistance. Besides, as well-killing displacement increases H2S will gasify at an earlier time. When drilling for H2S-containing natural gas well, early detection of gas kick should be more frequent to avoid severe overflow. Besides, higher displacement and density of drilling fluid should be considered to avoid stratum fracturing and prevent leakage accidents under the premise of meeting drilling requirements.

Highlights

  • Gas kick and well-killing are the main concerns of well control during the drilling of oil and gas fields

  • Various multiphase flow models have been proposed to predict the flow pattern distribution in the wellbore after gas kick (Amaya-Gómez et al, 2019; Ansari et al, 1994; Bilicki and Kestin, 1987; Ebrahimi and Khamehchi, 2015; Feng et al, 2015; Guo et al, 2018; Hasan and Kabir, 1988; Kelessidis and Dukler, 1989; Li and Mouline, 1997; Zhang et al, 2019); among them, the most widely used in drilling engineering are the patterns of bubble, slug, churn, and annular flows (Osman, 2004; Raghavan, 1989; Sun et al, 2017)

  • Considering that the phase change of H2S occurs at low pressure and temperature and the phase change of H2S has a great effect on the pressure distribution (Sun et al, 2013), the diagrams of wellhead flow pattern when gas reaches wellhead during well killing under different working conditions are depicted to study the flows at wellhead

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gas kick and well-killing are the main concerns of well control during the drilling of oil and gas fields. Wang proposed a mathematical model to predict the multiphase flow in a wellbore for deep water wells (Wang et al, 2016) Their model has been used to study the phase transition of hydrate during the exploitation of natural gas hydrate (Wang and Sun, 2009, 2014). Sun and Wang et al established a multiphase flow model that considers the phase change of the H2S in the drilling fluid; simulation results showed that, as the invasion gas moves up along the wellbore to the critical position of H2S, the released H2S may cause a rapid volume expansion, thereby increasing the blowout risk (Sun et al, 2013, 2018). H2S-containing natural gas well were obtained and analyzed in this work

Governing equations for mass and momentum
Transient temperature prediction model
Flow pattern discriminant
H2S solubility
Friction pressure drop
Gas production
Solution for mass and momentum governing equations
Solution for transient temperature prediction model
Model coupling
Model validation
Result of this model
Case study
Analysis under different H2S contents
Analysis under different initial overflow volumes
Analysis under different well-killing displacements
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.