Abstract

A new multidisciplinary workflow is suggested to re-characterize the Hamra Quartzite (QH) formation using artificial neural networks. This approach involves core description, routine core analysis, special core analysis and raw logs of fourteen wells. An efficient electrofacies clustering neural network technology based on a self-organizing map is performed. The inputs in the model computation are: neutron porosity, gamma ray and bulk density logs. According to the self-organizing map results, the reservoir is composed of five electrofacies (EF1 to EF5): EF1, EF2 and EF3 with good reservoir quality, EF4 with moderate quality, and EF5 with bad quality. Hydraulic flow units are determined from well logs and core data using the flow zone indicator (FZI) approach and the multilayer perception (MLP) method. Obtained results indicate eight optimal hydraulic flow units. Hydraulic flow units for un-cored well are determined using the MLP, the used inputs to train the neural system are: neutron porosity, gamma ray, bulk density and predefined electrofacies. A dynamic rock typing is achieved using the FZI approach and combining special core data analysis to better characterize the hydraulic reservoir behavior. A best-fit relationship between water saturation and J-function is established and a good saturation match is obtained between capillary pressure and interpreted log results.

Highlights

  • A crucial step in building a geological model is the assignment of petrophysical properties in the model cells between and beyond the existing well control [1]

  • Geologists characterize lithofacies based on similar diagenetic process and depositional environment [4], petrophysicists determine EFs based on the same responses of log measurements in a well and reservoir engineers describe hydraulic flow unit (HFU) based on the identical pore size distribution and pore throat size [5]

  • Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research In this study, we present a multidisciplinary workflow for dynamic rock typing in reservoir characterization based on core description, well logs, routine core analysis (RCA) and special core analysis (SCAL)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A crucial step in building a geological model is the assignment of petrophysical properties (porosity, permeability, fluid saturations) in the model cells between and beyond the existing well control [1]. Geologists characterize lithofacies based on similar diagenetic process and depositional environment [4], petrophysicists determine EFs based on the same responses of log measurements in a well and reservoir engineers describe HFUs based on the identical pore size distribution and pore throat size [5] These disciplines are not studying the rock types in the same manner and there is a complex correlation between terminologies due to dimensionality problems [3]. Artificial neural network (ANN) approaches are often employed in reservoir characterization dealing with EF and HFU modeling [7,8,9] They are powerful tools in reservoir nonlinearity examination [10]. Multilayer perception (MLP) neural networks have been recognized as universal function approximators [9, 13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call