Abstract

This work is focused on the investigation of the structural behavior of a composite floor beam, located in the cargo zone of a civil aircraft, subjected to cyclical low-frequency compressive loads with different amplitudes. In the first stage, the numerical models able to correctly simulate the investigated phenomenon have been defined. Different analyses have been performed, aimed to an exhaustive evaluation of the structural behavior of the test article. In particular, implicit and explicit analyses have been considered to preliminary assess the capabilities of the numerical model. Then, explicit non-linear analyses under time-dependent loads have been considered, to predict the behavior of the composite structure under cyclic loading conditions. According to the present investigation, low-frequency cyclic loads with peak values lower than the static buckling load value are not capable of triggering significant instability.

Highlights

  • Buckling is an instability phenomenon typical of “thin” structures

  • A very detailed study was presented by the authors, which categorized the phenomenon according to the nature of the external load, whose direction can vary depending on the deformation of the structure, classifying the dynamic buckling problems as flutter or pulse buckling

  • Once the numerical model has been validated, explicit numerical analyses [35,36] have been performed on Test Case 2 to investigate the arising of the dynamic buckling phenomenon

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Buckling is an instability phenomenon typical of “thin” structures (characterized by at least one very small dimension compared to the others). A very detailed study was presented by the authors, which categorized the phenomenon according to the nature of the external load, whose direction can vary depending on the deformation of the structure, classifying the dynamic buckling problems as flutter or pulse buckling. Preliminary finite element models have been presented and compared, considering different in-plane and through-the-thickness element dimensions, different element types, and different material formulations, in order to find the model that more faithfully reproduces the investigated phenomenon The latter has been used for the subsequent numerical investigation: The static stability limit of the composite stanchion (identified by its static critical buckling load) has been found; three different low-frequency cyclic load conditions have been considered (below, close, and above the static critical buckling load).

Results and Discussion
Five elements in the thickness direction:
Validation of the Numerical Model
Dynamic Buckling Analysis
10. Implicit–explicitformulation formulation comparisons
Equivalent laminate mechanical
19. Out-of-plane displacement:
22. Strain
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.