Abstract
Different risk measures emphasize different aspects of a random loss. If we examine the investment performance according to different spectra of the risk measures, any policy generated from a mean-risk portfolio model with a sole risk measure may not be a good choice. We study in this paper the dynamic portfolio selection problem with multiple risk measures in a continuous-time setting. More specifically, we investigate the dynamic mean-variance-CVaR (Conditional value at Risk) formulation and the dynamic mean-variance-SFP (Safety-First-Principle) formulation, and derive analytical solutions for both problems, when all the market parameters are deterministic. Combining a downside risk measure with the variance (the second order central moment) in a dynamic mean-risk portfolio selection model helps investors control both the symmetric central risk measure and the asymmetric downside risk at the tail part of the loss. We find that the optimal portfolio policy derived from our mean-multiple risk portfolio optimization model exhibits a feature of two-side threshold type, i.e., when the current wealth level is either below or above certain threshold, the optimal policy would dictate an increase in the allocation of the risky assets. Our numerical experiments using real market data further demonstrate that our dynamic mean-multiple risk portfolio models reduce significantly both the variance and the downside risk, when compared with the static buy-and-hold portfolio policy.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call