Abstract
Background and AimMagnifying endoscopy (ME) diagnostic algorithm for early gastric cancer (EGC) relies on qualitative features such as microvascular (MV) architecture and microsurface structure; however, it is a “static” diagnostic algorithm that uses still images. ME can visualize red blood cell flow within subepithelial microvessels in real time. Here, we evaluated the utility of using the MV blood flow rate in combination with ME for the diagnosis of EGC as a retrospective study.MethodsPatients with differentiated‐type EGC (n = 10) or patchy redness (n = 10) underwent ME with blue laser imaging. The mean MV blood flow rates of EGC, patchy redness, and background mucosa were calculated by the mean movement distance of one tagging red blood cell using split images of ME with blue laser imaging videos. We compared the mean MV blood flow rate between EGC, patchy redness, and background mucosa and also calculated the MV blood flow imaging ratio (inside lesion/background mucosa) between EGC and patchy redness.ResultsMean MV blood flow rate was significantly lower in EGC (1481 μm/s; range 1057–1762) than in patchy redness (3859 μm/s; 2435–5899) or background mucosa (4140.6 μm/s; 2820–6247) (P < 0.01). The MV blood flow imaging ratio was significantly lower in EGC (0.39; 0.27–0.62) than in patchy redness (0.90; 0.78–1.1) (P < 0.01).ConclusionsDynamic diagnosis with MV blood flow rate using ME may be useful for the differential diagnosis of EGC and patchy redness. Endoscopic assessment of dynamic processes within the gastric mucosa may facilitate the diagnosis of EGC.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have