Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of dye leakage (in the presence versus absence of blood) in root end cavities filled with amalgam, Super EBA, IRM, and a mineral trioxide aggregate. After removing the anatomical crowns of 90 extracted human teeth, their roots were instrumented and obturated. Except for their apical 2 mm, the root surfaces were sealed with nail polish. After removal of the apical 2 to 3 mm of each root, a standardized root end cavity was prepared. Five root ends were filled with gutta-percha and no sealer, and another five root ends were filled with sticky wax. These served as positive and negative controls, respectively. The remaining 80 roots were divided into four equal groups and filled with the test materials. For each material, half of the root end cavities were dried prior to placing the filling material. The remaining half were filled after they were contaminated with blood. All 90 roots were then immediately placed in 1% methylene blue dye for 72 h. Finally, the roots were split and linear dye penetration was measured and statistically analyzed (analysis of variance). Presence or absence of blood had no significant effect on the amount of dye leakage. However, the results showed that there was a significant leakage difference between the root end filling materials (p < 0.0001). Mineral trioxide aggregate leaked significantly less than other materials tested with or without blood contamination of the root end cavities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.