Abstract

Photosynthetic responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to increasing durations of weed-free and weedy environments were investigated using a critical period for weed control study under field conditions. The presence of weeds induced the shade avoidance response and was accompanied by a reduced red to far-red ratio (R/Fr) of reflected light supporting previous assertions it is an important signal regulating crop-weed interactions. Despite increases in stomatal conductance and leaf intercellular [CO2] with increasing duration of weed presence, CO2 assimilation and photosynthetic efficiency continually declined. This coincided with reduced Calvin cycle capacity suggesting induction of biochemical rather than stomatal limitations on photosynthesis. Weed removal prior to reproductive stages resulted in maintenance of high photosynthetic capacity. When weed presence extended to reproductive stages and beyond the critical period for weed control, however, CO2 assimilation and photosynthetic efficiency never recovered. Yield was highly correlated with photosynthetic efficiency and in a similar manner, declined with increasing durations of weed presence through reduced seeds per plant. We conclude that the lasting consequence of weed competition is impairment of photosynthesis, which may provide an important mechanism to explain yield loss.

Highlights

  • Neighboring weeds have a profound effect on the light environment of emerging crop seedlings, when competition for resources and mutual shading is negligible (Ballaré, 1999)

  • Despite incoming PPFD above the bean canopy being similar between growing environments and treatments, significant differences in reflected light quality were observed within the bean canopy (Figures 1B,C)

  • We found that the presence of neighboring weeds throughout vegetative growth of common bean (W, W

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neighboring weeds have a profound effect on the light environment of emerging crop seedlings, when competition for resources and mutual shading is negligible (Ballaré, 1999). Early responses of crop plants to low R/Fr light signals, reflected from neighboring weeds, has been implicated in induction of the shade avoidance response (SAR) and reductions in biomass accumulation and yield potential under field conditions (Page et al, 2009; Green-Tracewicz et al, 2012). These long-term effects have been associated with reduced capacity to acquire resources and induction of the SAR rather than direct resource limitation caused by weed competition (Rajcan and Swanton, 2001). Several studies support the notion that reductions in yield potential are positively related to the duration of weed presence following crop seedling emergence and the SAR and that yield potential is not recovered following weed removal (Van Acker et al, 1993; Page et al, 2010; Green-Tracewicz et al, 2012; Fickett et al, 2013b; Horvath et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call