Abstract

BackgroundThe Dmbx1 gene is important for the development of the midbrain and hindbrain, and mouse gene targeting experiments reveal that this gene is required for mediating postnatal and adult feeding behaviours. A single Dmbx1 gene exists in terrestrial vertebrate genomes, while teleost genomes have at least two paralogs. We compared the loss of function of the zebrafish dmbx1a and dmbx1b genes in order to gain insight into the molecular mechanism by which dmbx1 regulates neurogenesis, and to begin to understand why these duplicate genes have been retained in the zebrafish genome.ResultsUsing gene knockdown experiments we examined the function of the dmbx1 gene paralogs in zebrafish, dmbx1a and dmbx1b in regulating neurogenesis in the developing retina and midbrain. Dose-dependent loss of dmbx1a and dmbx1b function causes a significant reduction in growth of the midbrain and retina that is evident between 48-72 hpf. We show that this phenotype is not due to patterning defects or persistent cell death, but rather a deficit in progenitor cell cycle exit and differentiation. Analyses of the morphant retina or anterior hindbrain indicate that paralogous function is partially diverged since loss of dmbx1a is more severe than loss of dmbx1b. Molecular evolutionary analyses of the Dmbx1 genes suggest that while this gene family is conservative in its evolution, there was a dramatic change in selective constraint after the duplication event that gave rise to the dmbx1a and dmbx1b gene families in teleost fish, suggestive of positive selection. Interestingly, in contrast to zebrafish dmbx1a, over expression of the mouse Dmbx1 gene does not functionally compensate for the zebrafish dmbx1a knockdown phenotype, while over expression of the dmbx1b gene only partially compensates for the dmbx1a knockdown phenotype.ConclusionOur data suggest that both zebrafish dmbx1a and dmbx1b genes are retained in the fish genome due to their requirement during midbrain and retinal neurogenesis, although their function is partially diverged. At the cellular level, Dmbx1 regulates cell cycle exit and differentiation of progenitor cells. The unexpected observation of putative post-duplication positive selection of teleost Dmbx1 genes, especially dmbx1a, and the differences in functionality between the mouse and zebrafish genes suggests that the teleost Dmbx1 genes may have evolved a diverged function in the regulation of neurogenesis.

Highlights

  • The Dmbx1 gene is important for the development of the midbrain and hindbrain, and mouse gene targeting experiments reveal that this gene is required for mediating postnatal and adult feeding behaviours

  • A single Dmbx1 gene exists in the genomes of terrestrial vertebrates, while teleost genomes contain at least two paralogs: dmbx1a and dmbx1b [7], coincident with the more recent additional round of gene/genome duplication that is speculated to have occurred in the teleost lineage [15,16]

  • We examined the expression of phospho-histone H3, which labels cells in M-phase of the cell cycle, and found that there was approximately a twofold increase in the number of pHH3+ cells [Control (n = 3): 15.3 ± 4.7 vs. MO1a + MO1b (n = 3): 28.0 ± 3.4; t = 3.7, p < 0.05] in transverse sections of the double morphant retinas primarily localized to the apical domain if the ciliary marginal zone (CMZ) and central retina (Figure 7H) compared to controls (Figure 7G)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Dmbx gene is important for the development of the midbrain and hindbrain, and mouse gene targeting experiments reveal that this gene is required for mediating postnatal and adult feeding behaviours. A single Dmbx gene exists in the genomes of terrestrial vertebrates, while teleost genomes contain at least two paralogs: dmbx1a and dmbx1b (previously annotated as mbx and mbx2) [7], coincident with the more recent additional round of gene/genome duplication that is speculated to have occurred in the teleost lineage [15,16]. This has lead us to examine why both copies of the dmbx gene duplicate have been retained in the zebrafish genome

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.