Duhamel Versus Swenson Pull-Through for Total Colonic Aganglionosis: A Multi-Institutional Study

Abstract

BackgroundTotal colonic aganglionosis (TCA) is a rare variant of Hirschsprung disease (HD) where the colon and portion of distal ileum lack ganglion cells. Most pediatric use either a straight ileoanal (Swenson or Yancey-Soave) or a short Duhamel pull-through for TCA. There are no large studies comparing these techniques. We aimed to compare short-and medium-term outcomes between these approaches. MethodA retrospective review was performed among children with TCA from 2001 to 2019 undergoing a primary Duhamel or Swenson pull-through across three large children's hospitals. Patients undergoing redo and patients with greater than 30 % small bowel aganglionosis were excluded. We gathered data on demographics, operative approach, and outcomes at one, two, and three years. Continuous variables were analyzed with t-tests and categorical variables with Chi square or Fisher's tests. ResultsThere were 54 patients, with 26 (48 %) undergoing Duhamel and 28 (52 %) undergoing Swenson pull-through. There were no differences in sex, age, medical comorbidities, or operative details, including age at pull-through, laparoscopic vs open, length of involved small bowel, and operative time. Length of stay and post-operative complications were not different. Three years after pull-through, patients undergoing Duhamel had fewer stools per day (1-3 stools 69.6 % vs 14.3 %, p = 0.003) and were less likely to be prescribed fiber supplementation (4.2 % vs 43.8 %, p = 0.003). There were no differences in irrigations, botulinum toxin administration, loperamide, or HD admissions. ConclusionBoth Duhamel and straight pull-throughs are safe for treatment of TCA, with acceptable short- and medium-term outcomes. Further studies on patient-reported outcomes are necessary to examine long-term differences. Level of EvidenceIII.