Abstract

Abstract. Inferential models have long been used to determine pollutant dry deposition to ecosystems from measurements of air concentrations and as part of national and regional atmospheric chemistry and transport models, and yet models still suffer very large uncertainties. An inferential network of 55 sites throughout Europe for atmospheric reactive nitrogen (Nr) was established in 2007, providing ambient concentrations of gaseous NH3, NO2, HNO3 and HONO and aerosol NH4+ and NO3− as part of the NitroEurope Integrated Project. Network results providing modelled inorganic Nr dry deposition to the 55 monitoring sites are presented, using four existing dry deposition routines, revealing inter-model differences and providing ensemble average deposition estimates. Dry deposition is generally largest over forests in regions with large ambient NH3 concentrations, exceeding 30–40 kg N ha−1 yr−1 over parts of the Netherlands and Belgium, while some remote forests in Scandinavia receive less than 2 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Turbulent Nr deposition to short vegetation ecosystems is generally smaller than to forests due to reduced turbulent exchange, but also because NH3 inputs to fertilised, agricultural systems are limited by the presence of a substantial NH3 source in the vegetation, leading to periods of emission as well as deposition. Differences between models reach a factor 2–3 and are often greater than differences between monitoring sites. For soluble Nr gases such as NH3 and HNO3, the non-stomatal pathways are responsible for most of the annual uptake over many surfaces, especially the non-agricultural land uses, but parameterisations of the sink strength vary considerably among models. For aerosol NH4+ and NO3− discrepancies between theoretical models and field flux measurements lead to much uncertainty in dry deposition rates for fine particles (0.1–0.5 μm). The validation of inferential models at the ecosystem scale is best achieved by comparison with direct long-term micrometeorological Nr flux measurements, but too few such datasets are available, especially for HNO3 and aerosol NH4+ and NO3−.

Highlights

  • The environmental effects of excess atmospheric reactive nitrogen (Nr) deposition to terrestrial ecosystems include soil acidification, the eutrophication of water bodies, nutrient imbalances, the leaching of base cation and nitrate, loss of biodiversity, direct toxicity to plants, increased N2O emissions, and the inhibition of soil CH4 oxidation (Galloway et al, 2003; Erisman et al, 2007)

  • The four dry deposition routines implemented in this study, which are currently used as modules within chemical transport models (CTMs) at national or continental scales in Europe and N

  • Deposition estimates that are provided in this paper for any of the 4 models refer by default to “local” or ecosystemscale runs of the dry deposition routines, rather than to the grid square average (e.g. 50 × 50 km) that could be provided by the CTM version

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The environmental effects of excess atmospheric reactive nitrogen (Nr) deposition to terrestrial ecosystems include soil acidification, the eutrophication of water bodies, nutrient imbalances, the leaching of base cation and nitrate, loss of biodiversity, direct toxicity to plants, increased N2O emissions, and the inhibition of soil CH4 oxidation (Galloway et al, 2003; Erisman et al, 2007). Dry and wet deposition control the atmospheric life times and mean transport distances of Nr species downwind from point and diffuse sources and affect pollutant transport across borders. Flechard et al.: Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen to European ecosystems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call