Abstract

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with and without microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of advanced and standard treatment-refractory/ineligible non-small cell lung cancer (ASTRI-NSCLC).Materials and MethodsA total of 77 ASTRI-NSCLC patients who received DEB-BACE combined with MWA (group A; n = 28) or DEB-BACE alone (group B; n = 49) were included. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups A and B. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to compare the median progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to investigate the predictors of OS for ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.ResultsNo severe adverse event was found in both groups. Pneumothorax was the predominant MWA-related complication in group A, with an incidence rate of 32.1% (9/28). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in DEB-BACE-related complications between groups A and B. The overall disease control rate (DCR) was 61.0% (47/77), with a significantly higher DCR in group A (85.7% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.002). The median PFS in groups A and B was 7.0 and 4.0 months, respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0.037). The median OS in groups A and B was both 8.0 months, with no significant difference (P = 0.318). The 6-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 75.0% and 78.6%, 22.4% and 59.2%, respectively, while the 12-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 17.9% and 28.6%, 14.3% and 22.4%, respectively. Of these, a significantly higher 6-month PFS rate was found in group A (75.0% vs. 22.4%; P < 0.001). The cycles of DEB-BACE/bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.363; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.202–0.655; P = 0.001] and postoperative immunotherapy (HR: 0.219; 95% CI: 0.085–0.561; P = 0.002) were identified as the predictors of OS in ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.ConclusionMWA sequentially combined with DEB-BACE was superior to DEB-BACE alone in the local control of ASTRI-NSCLC. Although the combination therapy reveals a trend of prolonging the OS, long-term prognosis warrants an investigation with a longer follow-up.

Highlights

  • Primary lung cancer has an incidence and mortality of over 2.2 million and 1.79 million, respectively, estimated globally in 2020 [1]

  • Patient exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) concomitant radioactive seed implantation was performed during MWA procedure; (b) incomplete data; (c) lost to followup; (d) MWA combined with bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy (BAI); and (e) period between MWA and DEBBACE longer than 1.5 months

  • There were 21 patients (27.3%) who received immunotherapy after DEB-BACE, with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade administered in six patients (7.8%) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade administered in 15 patients (19.5%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Primary lung cancer has an incidence and mortality of over 2.2 million and 1.79 million, respectively, estimated globally in 2020 [1]. The standard treatments for unresectable advanced NSCLC include chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy [such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)], and immunotherapy. It often develops refractoriness and almost 59% of unresectable stage III NSCLC patients are ineligible for chemoradiotherapy owing to the severe adverse events [4]. The prognosis of advanced NSCLC remains dismal, with a 5-year survival rate of 15% for stage III and that of less than 10% for stage IV [5]. 30%–50% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed with poor performance status owing to cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases and are ineligible for systemic therapy [6]. The therapeutic strategy for advanced and standard treatment-refractory/ineligible NSCLC (ASTRI-NSCLC) patients remains limited

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.