Abstract

Liquid drops on soft solids generate strong deformations below the contact line, resulting from a balance of capillary and elastic forces. The movement of these drops may cause strong, potentially singular dissipation in the soft solid. Here we show that a drop on a soft substrate moves by surfing a ridge: the initially flat solid surface is deformed into a sharp ridge whose orientation angle depends on the contact line velocity. We measure this angle for water on a silicone gel and develop a theory based on the substrate rheology. We quantitatively recover the dynamic contact angle and provide a mechanism for stick–slip motion when a drop is forced strongly: the contact line depins and slides down the wetting ridge, forming a new one after a transient. We anticipate that our theory will have implications in problems such as self-organization of cell tissues or the design of capillarity-based microrheometers.

Highlights

  • Liquid drops on soft solids generate strong deformations below the contact line, resulting from a balance of capillary and elastic forces

  • A dissipation singularity arises at the moving contact line[14] and its regularization at the nanoscopic scale can result from various processes[13,15]

  • Pioneering experiments have shown that the softness drastically slows down the wetting dynamics[24,25] in comparison to rigid solids

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liquid drops on soft solids generate strong deformations below the contact line, resulting from a balance of capillary and elastic forces. The movement of these drops may cause strong, potentially singular dissipation in the soft solid. We show that a drop on a soft substrate moves by surfing a ridge: the initially flat solid surface is deformed into a sharp ridge whose orientation angle depends on the contact line velocity. We measure this angle for water on a silicone gel and develop a theory based on the substrate rheology. The theoretical description of moving contact lines over soft solids is so far limited to global dissipation arguments[17], which, at least for wetting of rigid solids, are known not to capture the entire physics behind the process

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call