Abstract
The role of assistant practitioner (AP) was defined around 14 years ago. It is widely regarded as an innovative role, with the ability to work semi-autonomously and across conventional health boundaries, and between both the health and social care sectors. APs are non-registered, so are not subject to regulation like nurses. Their accountability, however, comes through working to locally agreed and defined protocols. They are able to undertake a wide range of technical tasks and work with a high degree of autonomy within a specified care plan. The role is often cited as an effective means of helping the sector meet the productivity challenges that it is confronted with. APs are credited with being able to take on a wide range of tasks that are traditionally, but not necessarily, undertaken by registered professionals. It is a role which many are happy to treat as a destination in its own right, and which others view as a stepping stone to move up to registered roles. Our own research at Skills for Health has seen that APs have become more successful in some areas than others. And while the role has had some successes, there is a case for significant and ongoing action to improve not only training and development for support workers, but also to clarify and develop high-quality support worker roles, of which the AP is an important aspiration and legitimate channel.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.