Abstract
Optical sensors cannot penetrate clouds and can cause serious missing data problems in optical-based Land Surface Temperature (LST) products. Under cloudy conditions, microwave observations are usually utilized to derive the land surface temperature. However, microwave sensors usually have coarse spatial resolutions. High-Resolution (HR) LST data products are usually desired for many applications. Instead of developing and launching new high-resolution satellite sensors for LST observations, a more economical and practical way is to develop proper methodologies to derive high-resolution LSTs from available Low-Resolution (LR) datasets. This study explores different algorithms to downscale low-resolution LST data to a high resolution. The existing regression-based downscaling methods usually require simultaneous observations and ancillary data. The Super-Resolution Reconstruction (SRR) method developed for traditional image enhancement can be applicable to high-resolution LST generation. For the first time, we adapted the SRR method for LST data. We specifically built a unique database of LSTs for the example-based SRR method. After deriving the LST data from the coarse-resolution passive microwave observations, the AMSR-E at 25 km and/or AMSR-2 at 10 km, we developed an algorithm to downscale them to a 1 km spatial resolution with the SRR method. The SRR downscaling algorithm can be implemented to obtain high-resolution LSTs without auxiliary data or any concurrent observations. The high-resolution LSTs are validated and evaluated with the ground measurements from the Surface Radiation (SURFRAD) Budget Network. The results demonstrate that the downscaled microwave LSTs have a high correlation coefficient of over 0.92, a small bias of less than 0.5 K, but a large Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of about 4 K, which is similar to the original microwave LST, so the errors in the downscaled LST could have been inherited from the original microwave LSTs. The validation results also indicate that the example-based method shows a better performance than the self-similarity-based algorithm.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.