Abstract
The performance evaluation system in academia has been much criticized during the last years. But there are few suggestions how to improve it. In particular double blind pre-publication peer review has become a sacred cow that has not been touched. We analyze the flaws of the present system and discuss open post-publication peer review as a promising alternative.
Full Text
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Published version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have