Dosimetric Implications of Margin-Reduced MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to the Prostate Bed Following Radical Prostatectomy: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase II Study

Abstract

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Due to the highly deformable and mobile nature of the target volume and adjacent organs at risk (OARs), generous planning target volume (PTV) margins have historically been used in the context of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. MRI-guided radiotherapy systems have improved on-board imaging capabilities and the ability to perform automatic beam holds based on pre-specified structures. Herein, we evaluate the dosimetric implications of interfraction variations in the clinical target volumes (CTV) and OARs in patients receiving margin-reduced MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the prostate bed. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> 31 consecutive patients received MRI-guided SBRT to the prostate bed (30 – 34 Gy in 5 fractions) without adaptive planning on a phase II study. The OAR volumes, CTV, and PTV (created using a 3 mm isotropic expansion of the CTV) were retrospectively contoured on on-board 0.35T MRIs obtained prior to each fraction (n=155). Geometric comparisons were made between the initial planning contours and the 5 daily contours for each patient using change in volume and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) calculations. Coverage of the CTV and PTV was assessed (CTV V95% >93% and PTV V95% >90%), as were bladder and rectal dose constraints (Bladder Dmax <36.7 Gy, Bladder V32.5 Gy <35%, Rectum Dmax <36.7 Gy, Rectum V27.5 Gy <45%, Rectum 32.5 Gy <30%, and Rectal Wall V24 <50%). <h3>Results</h3> The median change in volume was -24.5% (interquartile range [IQR], -35.5 – -2.2%) for the bladder, 6.95% (IQR, -6.94 – 23.0%) for the rectum, -0.2% (IQR, -8.3 – 8.7%) for the rectal wall, 0.48% (IQR, -3.87 – 7.6%) for the CTV, and -0.48% (IQR, -5.12 – 6.53%) for the PTV. The median DSC was 0.79 (IQR, 0.73 – 0.84) for the bladder, 0.76 (IQR, 0.69 – 0.81) for the rectum, 0.35 (IQR, 0.28 – 0.44) for the rectal wall, 0.89 (IQR, 0.83 – 0.93) for the CTV, and 0.90 (IQR, 0.87 – 0.95) for the PTV. 145/155 fractions (93.5%) met the CTV V95% >93% target and 134/155 fractions (86.5%) met both the CTV V95% >93% and PTV V95% >90% targets. When calculated over 5 cumulative fractions, 29/31 patients (93.5%) met the CTV goal of V95% >93%. 62/155 fractions (40%) failed at least one OAR constraint. The mean number of fractions per patient that failed at least one OAR constraint was 2/5 (median, 1; range, 0 – 5). <h3>Conclusion</h3> With MRI-guidance, a reduction of the PTV margin to 3 mm isotropically allows for adequate CTV coverage in over 90% of patients without the need for adaptive planning. However, OAR constraints are not met in 40% of delivered fractions despite meeting all dose constraints at the time of treatment planning. Online dose prediction and, if indicated, adaptive radiotherapy can optimize this to allow for improved OAR protection and potentially allow for further reductions in the PTV expansion while maintaining adequate CTV coverage.