Abstract
Purpose Quantify the dosimetric effect of inter- and intrafractional motion on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional (3D) planning via changes in the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), predicted tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for pediatric ependymoma. Methods and materials Twenty patients treated between 1998 and 2002 with a 3D plan (CTV = 1 cm, PTV = 5 mm) were selected. Two IMRT plans were created for the 1 cm CTV (PTV = 5 mm and PTV = 0 mm), and a third IMRT plan for a 5 mm CTV (PTV = 0 mm). Direct simulation with inter- and intrafractional motion was performed for 3D and IMRT plans based on daily pre and post-treatment cone beam CT information obtained from 20 well-matched patients (age, supine/prone, use of GA) on a localization protocol. Calculated TCP, NTCP, Conformity Index (CI), and predictive IQ were compared. Results IMRT improved the calculated TCP by 2.8 ± 2.8 vs. 3D ( p < 0.001). Inter- and intrafractional motion results in a TCP loss of 0.4 ± 0.7 ( p = 0.02) and 0.0 ± 0.1 ( p = 0.14) for the IMRT plan with PTV = 0 mm. Mean NTCP for 3D and IMRT with PTV = 5 mm, PTV = 0 mm, and CTV = 5 mm for the cochlea was: 66.6, 29.4, 8.7. Mean NTCP change due to motion was <5%. CI was 0.70 ± 0.06 for IMRT and 0.5 ± 0.10 for 3D. Predictive IQ was 10.0 ± 10.3 points higher for IMRT vs. 3D. Conclusions IMRT improves calculated TCP vs. 3D. Daily localization can allow for a safe reduction in the PTV margin, while maintaining target coverage; reducing the CTV margin can further reduce NTCP and may reduce future side-effects.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call