Dosimetric comparison of short and full arc in spinal PTV in volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based craniospinal irradiation

Abstract

Since 2011 when it was first described, the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has always seen the use of large arc lengths for the spine fields ranging from 200° to 360°. This study was aimed to do a dosimetric comparison between the large and shorter spinal arc for CSI. For a cohort of 10 patients, 2 VMAT CSI plans were created for each patient, one using the conventional full 360° arc (VMAT_FA) for the spine and the other using 100° posterior arc (VMAT_PA) for 23.4 Gy and 35 Gy prescriptions. In both the plans, 360° arc fields were employed for treating cranial volume. Spillage dose (DBody-PTV) to Body-PTV (DBody-PTV: dose to body excluding planning target volume) was compared with VMAT_FA and VMAT_PA plans. In addition to these VMAT plans, a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan was also created for all these patients to compare the DBody-PTV and target volume related dose constraints. Mean D95% difference between the two VMAT plans did not exceed 1.3% for cranial and spinal targets for both prescription levels. The conformity index (CI) was averaged over both prescription doses. Average CI shows a similar value for VMAT_FA (0.84 ± 0.04) and VMAT_PA (0.82 ± 0.05) plans. D95%, V110% and CI did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between partial and full-arc VMAT plans. However, the VMAT_PA plan exhibited a lower DBody-PTV compared to VMAT_FA plans (0.007 ≤ p < 0.05) in the 1 to 5 Gy range. Nevertheless, partial arc plans could not offer a statistically significant dose reduction for delineated organs compared to full arc plans, except for bilateral kidneys.