Abstract

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) directly damages vertebral growth plates causing skeletal dysplasia leading to reduced height in pediatric long-term survivors. The objective of this study is to quantify the adjusted effect of CSI on standing and sitting height by radiation dose and modality in children. Two hundred sixty-five patients (M/F 169/96) were treated at a single institution on a clinical and molecular risk-directed trial for medulloblastoma (NCT01878617) using proton or photon therapy. Three CSI dose regimens were evaluated: 15 Gy (n = 31), 23.4 Gy (n = 103), ≥36 Gy (n = 131). Vertebral body dose was limited to 18-20 CGE for 23.4 Gy or 36 Gy proton therapy. All patients received post-CSI protocol-specified chemotherapy. Non-parametric tests were applied for baseline patient comparison. Changes in growth over time were calculated using random coefficients models using patient-specific intercepts and slopes. Dose-effects were modeled for ages 5, 10, and 18 years. Age at CSI and race were similar between the three dose levels. Females most often received 23.4 Gy and males ≥36 Gy (p = 0.001). Higher CSI doses were associated with photon therapy (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 3 years (range 0.1-7.1). Annual growth rate was significantly different between 15 Gy (3.66 cm/year) and the higher dose levels of 23.4 Gy (2.81 cm/year, p = 0.0389) and ≥36 Gy (2.46 cm/year, p = 0.0032). Lower annual growth rate in females (vs. males, p = 0.0331) was observed in models for those aged 5 (-0.17 cm/year), 10 (-0.35 cm/year), and 18 years (-0.62 cm/year). In multivariate analysis, modelled annual growth rate was dose-dependent at ages 5 and 10 years. The differences were, respectively, 1.68 cm/year between 15 and 23.4 Gy (p = 0.0005) and 0.98 cm/year between 23.4 and ≥36 Gy (p = 0.0002), and 1.13 cm/year between 15 and 23.4 Gy (p = 0.0002) and 0.68 cm/year between 23.4 and ≥36 Gy (p = 0.0003). Radiation modality did not impact standing height over time significantly. Annual sitting height growth was 2.34, 1.67 and 1.1 cm/year for the three dose levels (p<0.0001-0.001). In the multivariate model, a 5-year-old receiving 15 or 23.4 Gy had similar annual sitting height growth, but not when 23.4 Gy was compared to ≥36 Gy (0.83 cm/year, p<0.0001). In a separate model for a patient aged 10 years, there was a difference comparing all CSI regimens (0.81 cm/year, p<0.0001, 15 vs 23.4 Gy; 0.54 cm/year, p = 0.0002, 23.4 vs ≥36 Gy). Sitting height growth was affected by CSI dose at age 18 years, with a difference of 2.2 cm/year between 15 vs 23.4 Gy (p = 0.0013), and no difference between 23.4 and ≥36 Gy. Annual growth rates show a dose-response relationship, independent of treatment modality. A dose-response in sitting height growth rate is seen at any age, while the annual standing height growth rate was only affected by CSI dose in 5- and 10-year-olds. While all CSI doses had a significant impact on the annual standing height, sitting height growth rates approximated normal values for those treated with a low CSI dose.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call