DOP49 Guselkumab improves health-related quality of life as measured by PROMIS-29 in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 3 QUASAR induction study

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC) suffer from symptoms that impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Phase 3 QUASAR induction study (NCT04033445) evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23 p19 subunit antagonist, in pts with moderately to severely active UC who had demonstrated inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to conventional and/or advanced therapies (ie, tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists, integrin receptor antagonists, and/or Janus kinase inhibitors). Here we report the effect of GUS IV induction on HRQoL at Week (Wk) 12 as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29. Methods Pts were randomized 3:2 to receive GUS 200 mg IV or placebo (PBO) IV at Wks 0/4/8. PROMIS-29 consists of 7 domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance, physical function, and social participation) and a pain intensity numeric rating scale (NRS, range 0-10). The raw score of each domain was converted into a standardized T-score based on a general population mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher scores indicate better outcomes for physical function and social participation and worse outcomes for all other domains. The physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were calculated based on the domain T-scores for physical and mental HRQoL, with higher scores representing better outcomes. Minimum clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a ≥3-point improvement in the pain intensity NRS score, a ≥5-point (one-half SD of the population) improvement in each domain, and a ≥5-point improvement in the PCS/MCS scores. More stringent thresholds (eg, ≥7- or ≥9-point improvements) were also examined and will be presented. Results Among the primary analysis population, baseline mean PROMIS-29 domain scores were similar between treatment groups, with functional domain scores <50 and symptom domain scores >50, indicating impaired HRQoL (Table). GUS-treated pts achieved a greater mean change from baseline at Wk 12 in each domain T-score, the pain intensity NRS score, and the PCS/MCS than PBO-treated pts. Additionally, the percentage of pts achieving minimum clinically meaningful improvement at Wk 12 was greater for GUS vs PBO in each domain, the pain intensity NRS score, and the PCS/MCS scores (Figure). Conclusion Pts with moderately to severely active UC treated with GUS IV induction experienced broad and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL as measured by the PROMIS-29 at Wk 12.