Abstract
Despite the vast transitional justice scholarship relating to prisoner release, amnesties and prosecutions when conflicts end, there is a significant gap in practice and academic literature regarding wrongful convictions. Uniquely amongst postâconflict societies,NorthernIreland has a body for investigating miscarriages of justice, albeit one designed for âordinaryâ appeals. In the absence of a formal truthârecovery process, criminal appeals are becoming a proxy for addressing the role of the state during âTheTroubles,â as well as remedying individual injustices. This article examines the approach of theNorthernIrelandCourt ofAppeal during the conflict. It charts the developments in its decisionâmaking following the ceaseâfires and the establishment of theCriminalCasesReviewCommission. It concludes that the current system is unsatisfactory as it ignores the effects of the conflict on the appeal process and offers no insights into the role of theCourt during the conflict. Alternative models are suggested.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have