Abstract

In several species, rank predicts access to food, and subordinates may need specific behavioural strategies to get a share of resources. This may be especially important in despotic species, where resources are strongly biased in favour of dominants and subordinates may more strongly rely on specific tactics to maximize food intake. Here, we compared three macaque species with an experimental set-up reproducing feeding competition contest. Following our predictions, more tolerant species mostly retrieved food in the presence of others and were less dependent on specific tactics. Contrarily, subordinates in more despotic species more likely collected food (1) when dominants could not see food or (2) were attacking others, (3) while “dissimulating”, or (4) “storing food”. Our study reveals that dominance styles reliably predict the probability of using specific food retrieval tactics and provides important insights on the social conditions that might have led to the emergence of tactical deception.

Highlights

  • In several species, rank predicts access to food, and subordinates may need specific behavioural strategies to get a share of resources

  • Our results showed that subordinates were more likely to temporarily store food (Fig. 1), and so were JM1

  • Our results showed that subordinates were more likely to retrieve peripheral food, and this was true across all species (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rank predicts access to food, and subordinates may need specific behavioural strategies to get a share of resources. Subordinates may use other strategies to increase their chances to obtain food They may avoid overlapping with dominants at feeding sites, by for instance using alternative and more peripheral food ­sources[11,15,16,17]. For instance, subordinates are more likely to store food in their cheek pouches when feeding competition is ­higher[21] This strategy could allow them to collect food and move away to consume it in a safer place. Inhibitory skills are required, as individuals have to postpone immediate gains to obtain larger delayed ­ones[22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.