Abstract

Beer fermentation processes are traditionally monitored through sampling and off-line wort density measurements. In-line and on-line sensors would provide real-time data on the fermentation progress whilst minimising human involvement, enabling identification of lagging fermentations or prediction of ethanol production end points. Ultrasonic sensors have previously been used for in-line and on-line fermentation monitoring and are increasingly being combined with machine learning models to interpret the sensor measurements. However, fermentation processes typically last many days and so impose a significant time investment to collect data from a sufficient number of batches for machine learning model training. This expenditure of effort must be multiplied if different fermentation processes must be monitored, such as varying formulations in craft breweries. In this work, three methodologies are evaluated to use previously collected ultrasonic sensor data from laboratory scale fermentations to improve machine learning model accuracy on an industrial scale fermentation process. These methodologies include training models on both domains simultaneously, training models in a federated learning strategy to preserve data privacy, and fine-tuning the best performing models on the industrial scale data. All methodologies provided increased prediction accuracy compared with training based solely on the industrial fermentation data. The federated learning methodology performed best, achieving higher accuracy for 14 out of 16 machine learning tasks compared with the base case model.

Highlights

  • IntroductionBeer fermentation processes are conventionally monitored through sampling and off-line wort density measurements [2]

  • Beer is one of the world’s oldest and most widely consumed alcoholic beverages [1].Beer fermentation processes are conventionally monitored through sampling and off-line wort density measurements [2]

  • The results show that the time of flight for the third reflection decreased, corresponding to an increase in the speed of sound, during ethanol production for all fermentations (Figure 3f)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Beer fermentation processes are conventionally monitored through sampling and off-line wort density measurements [2] This method is typically performed every couple of hours, requires manual operation, is time-consuming, and does not produce real-time results [3]. Automatic acquisition of real-time data pertaining to the fermenting wort would enable accurate process end point determination and identification of lagging fermentations This would provide benefits of improved product consistency, fewer lost batches, time savings, and environmental benefits of less waste and less resource and energy use [3]. This can be achieved through in-line and on-line sensing techniques, where in-line methods directly measure properties of the fermenting wort and on-line methods use bypasses to automatically collect, analyse, and return samples to the vessel [4].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call