Abstract
IntroductionIn the past decade, the incidence of community-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (CA-CDI) has increased, suggesting a role for community reservoirs such as animals in its spread. ObjectiveThis study aimed to isolate and characterize C. difficile strains from domestic dogs at veterinary clinics to enhance our understanding of C. difficile epidemiology in Rio de Janeiro. Material and methodsFor this study 90 stool samples from dogs were collected and cultured in a selective medium (Clostridioides difficile Brucella agar – CDBA) for isolation. Species were identified by MALDI-TOF MS, with confirmation provided by PCR targeting the tpi gene. The antibiotic susceptibility test of the strains was performed using five antibiotics: vancomycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and erythromycin. Strains resistant to metronidazole were further analyzed for the presence of the plasmid pCD-METRO using PCR. The presence of toxin genes (tcdA, tcdB, and cdtB) was investigated, alongside ribotyping and tcdC sequencing analyses. The strains were also tested for biofilm formation and motility. ResultsC. difficile was isolated in 15.5 % (14/90) of the samples. Among the strains analyzed, 87.71 % (12/14) tested positive for both toxin genes tcdA and tcdB and belonged to ribotypes 106 (10/14) and 014/020 (2/14). The remaining 14.3 % (2/14) were non-toxigenic and were identified as ribotype 010. Regarding the antibiotic profile, 42.85 % (6/14) of the strains exhibited resistance to at least one antibiotic, including vancomycin (1/14) and metronidazole (1/14). The metronidazole-resistant strain was also positive for the plasmid pCD-METRO. All strains exhibited both biofilm formation and motility. Among the 12 toxigenic strains sequenced for the tcdC gene, two exhibited a deletion in the same region as the epidemic strain, NAP1 (RT027). ConclusionOur study found some overlap between C. difficile ribotypes isolated from dogs and from cases of CDI in humans, and the C. difficile prevalence was higher in dogs with diarrhea (p = 0.034).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.