Abstract

This article evaluates Christian Zionism in light of the New Testament, with a focus on the Pauline corpus. In spite of the fact that the New Testament never mentions the promise of the land in terms of an outstanding promise of territorial inheritance for Israel, the land, which includes Jerusalem and the temple, is incorporated in God’s kingdom in the new era in Christ in a way that fulfils but transcends the original territorial form of the promise. In the New Testament, the land is spiritualised, universalised and eschatologised. The deeper criteria of being God’s people in the New Testament – faith and the indwelling Spirit – cohere with the understanding that historical Israel cannot be seen as continuing as God’s people in the New Testament era, or as still having a valid claim on God’s promises.

Highlights

  • In the version of this article initially published, the surname of Philip La Grange Du Toit was incorrectly listed as La Grange Du Toit in the ‘How to cite this article’ section

  • The error has been corrected in the PDF version of the article

  • The publisher apologises for any inconvenience that this may have caused

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the version of this article initially published, the surname of Philip La Grange Du Toit was incorrectly listed as La Grange Du Toit in the ‘How to cite this article’ section. Erratum: Does the New Testament support Christian Zionism?

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.