Abstract
The major research question, in the title of this paper, was answered positively for stock market performance. The companies with Ethics and Compliance Committees (ECC) outperformed the non-ECC companies on five-year annual averages for both profit margin and net income growth rate, which may mean Wall Street investors are emphasizing non-financial performance indicators, as well as long-term financial performance indicators. Results are somewhat mixed, as investors rewarded ECC companies with superior stock market performance versus other financial measures, like returns on equity and assets, which were better for non-ECC companies. The empirical analysis in this paper relied upon prior research which had conducted content analysis of the 2015 charters of all the board committees of the Fortune top 200 corporations (Holcomb, 2017). This prior research identified 11 companies which had board committees with ethics and compliance duties, versus the Fortune top 20 companies, which delegated such duties to their audit committees. The empirical research in this paper has shown that the Ethics 11 companies outperformed the Fortune top 20 companies over the 2013-2017 period, primarily in the key stock market performance measure of the percentage change of the market capitalization from the end of 2013 until the end of 2017.
Highlights
A prior research study in Corporate Ownership & Control (Holcomb, 2017) examined the extent to which U.S corporate boards established ethics and compliance committees and the underlying reasons for the development of such committees
As investors rewarded Ethics and Compliance Committees (ECC) companies with superior stock market performance versus other financial measures, like returns on equity and assets, which were better for non-ECC companies
The empirical research in this paper has shown that the Ethics 11 companies outperformed the Fortune top 20 companies over the 2013-2017 period, primarily in the key stock market performance measure of the percentage change of the market capitalization from the end of 2013 until the end of 2017
Summary
A prior research study in Corporate Ownership & Control (Holcomb, 2017) examined the extent to which U.S corporate boards established ethics and compliance committees and the underlying reasons for the development of such committees Such reasons included the evolving legal environment of business, the increasing regulatory compliance responsibilities, and the expanding ethical responsibilities. Contemporary non-financial risks include political, environmental, climate, governance, litigation, regulatory, product integrity, disaster, cybersecurity and global terror (Holcomb, 2017) By monitoring such non-financial risks, ethics and compliance committees might detect and identify red flags of possible threats or pressures which may fester and evolve into material financial performance risks. The following major sections of this paper are literature and policy review, causality issue, data and methodology, data results, interpretation of results, and conclusions
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
