Abstract
The major research question in this paper is whether improved corporate political disclosure and accountability lead to improved stock market and financial performance. To explore this question, the paper first examines the corporate financial performance of companies ranked by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA), and finds no significant relationship between a company’s ranking on the CPA and its financial and stock market performance. The paper hypothesizes that the reason for the lack of a relationship is because the CPA ranking system is itself flawed, insofar as the criteria used to evaluate corporate political accountability exclude important elements of political activity and potential corruption. To test this hypothesis, the paper adds revised criteria that include important aspects of corporate political activities and accountability. Using these revised criteria, the authors then re-evaluate and re-rank the 196 corporations in the top two quintiles of the S&P 500. The results show that, so long as appropriate criteria are used to measure corporate political disclosure and accountability practices, there is indeed a positive relationship between corporate political disclosure and accountability practices and improved financial and stock market performance.
Highlights
Scholars, policy-makers, and corporate managers are constantly searching for relationships between a company‟s practices and structures, and its financial and stock market performance
Both median and mean values were calculated for these stock market and financial performance measures in Table 1
The S&P 500 Index increased at the end of 2013 from 1848 to 2674 at the end of 2017, an increase of 44.7%, versus the superior performance by the Improved Companies of a mean increase of 92.1%, which is 106% better
Summary
Policy-makers, and corporate managers are constantly searching for relationships between a company‟s practices and structures, and its financial and stock market performance. This paper adds to that discourse by investigating the relationship between a company‟s political disclosure and accountability practices and its financial/stock market performance. Lead some to conclude that corporate political disclosure and accountability do not matter because such practices do not translate into improved financial and stock market performance. While it is true that a company‟s CPA ranking does not significantly correlate with improved financial and stock market performance, the reason it does not, we suspect, is because the CPA ranking of political disclosure and accountability practices itself is somewhat flawed. Corporate political disclosure and accountability are relevant and may impact a company‟s reputation and market capitalization
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.