Abstract
Since 1995, many centers have switched from bladder to enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions in simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplantation (SKPT). Enteric exocrine drainage may be performed with either systemic (systemic-enteric [S-E]) or portal (portal-enteric [P-E]) venous delivery of insulin. Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical technique. From March 1999 to May 2001, a total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled into a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies versus no-antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in SKPT recipients. Surgical techniques were center specific. A total of 171 patients (58%) underwent SKPT with S-E drainage, 96 (32%) with P-E drainage, and 30 (10%) with systemic-bladder (S-B) drainage. The two groups randomized to daclizumab induction were similar with regard to surgical technique (64% S-E, 25% P-E, 11% S-B drainage). Demographic and transplant characteristics and immunosuppression were similar among the three groups, except that more patients with P-E drainage did not receive antibody induction. At 6 months, no differences were seen in patient and graft survival rates, surgical complications including pancreas thrombosis, rates of rejection or infection, readmissions, and kidney and pancreas allograft function among the three different surgical techniques. The 6-month results of this multicenter study suggest no significant differences in outcomes in SKPT recipients according to surgical technique.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call