Abstract

Widespread acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination is the next major step in fighting the pandemic. However, significant variations are observed in the willingness to take the vaccination by citizens across different countries. Arguably, differences in vaccination intentions will be influenced by beliefs around vaccines to influence health. Often perceptions of what others are doing and the information available guide individuals' behaviors for vaccination. This is more so in the digital age with the influence of the internet and media. This study aims to determine the factors that impact willingness to vaccinate for COVID-19. We examined factors associated with acceptance of vaccine based on (1) constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM), (2) sources of information, (3) social media usage, (4) knowledge of COVID-19 treatment, and (5) perception of government's efforts for mitigation. Randomly sampled online survey data was collected by a global firm between December 2020 and January 2021 from 372 citizens (with a response rate of 96.6%) from multiple regions, including North America, the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. Ordered probit regression suggests that the health belief model constructs hold. Perceived severity of COVID-19 (P < 0.001) and action cues of others taking the vaccine positively influences a subject's vaccine intent (P < 0.001), perceived benefits and perceived efficacy of the vaccine positively influences a subject's vaccine intent (P < 0.001). Perceived barriers negatively influence vaccine intent (P < 0.001). Interestingly as for media usage, mainstream media (e.g., TV, newspaper) (P = 0.006) and social media (P = 0.013) both negatively influence a subject's vaccine intent. Social media platforms that are more entertainment and social-based, such as Whatsapp, Instagram, and YouTube, have a negative and significant influence on vaccine intent (P = 0.061), compared to other more information-based social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, LinkedIn). Knowledge of COVID-19 treatment positively influences vaccine intent (P = 0.023). Lastly, governmental efforts' perceived reliability in mitigation strategy (P = 0.028) and response efforts (P = 0.004) negatively influence vaccine intent. The study highlights the “wait-and-see” action cue from others and leaders in the community. It also informs the importance of shaping media information for vaccination through informative media and social media outlets to counteract any misinformation.

Highlights

  • Experts suggest that herd immunity to achieve a 60–90% threshold is a way to end the COVID-19 pandemic [1]

  • We focus on five major areas derived from extant literature: [1] constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM), [2] sources of information, [3] social media usage, [4] knowledge of COVID-19 treatment, and [5] a reliable perception of government’s efforts for mitigation

  • The independent variables we focused on include HBM constructs (ACTION CUES, SEVERITY, BENEFITS, BARRIERS), information source for COVID-19 information, social media usage for COVID-19 information, knowledge of symptoms, and knowledge of treatment COVID19, governmental efforts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Experts suggest that herd immunity to achieve a 60–90% threshold is a way to end the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. A vaccine helps individuals’ immune systems to develop protection from disease. Vaccination, through a “process of administration and distribution, reaching to a sufficiently large percentage of a population, provides herd immunity,” that in turn, protects the vaccinated as well as the non-vaccinated who may be immune-compromised and cannot get a vaccine because even a weakened version would harm them [2, 3]. A plethora of research suggests that vaccination is the most effective method of preventing several infectious diseases, such as smallpox, polio, and tetanus [4,5,6,7]. The countdown to reach herd immunity in the case of COVID-19 has started with the vaccination. Several vaccines are being distributed, and most of them are highly effective [10]. There is a concern that the vaccine’s uptake against the transmission and mutation of the virus may not be enough to manage herd immunity [11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call