Abstract
PICO question
 In stressed dogs, does using a Pet Remedy diffuser, compared to not using one, result in lowered stress levels?
 Clinical bottom line
 Three studies were reviewed, two that investigated Pet Remedy and one that investigated Valerian (an active ingredient in Pet Remedy) on aspects of canine behaviour associated with stress. The highest quality study was a randomised controlled trial that found that Pet Remedy had no significant effect on particularly stress-susceptible dogs exposed to an acute stressor. The weakest quality study was a randomised controlled trial that found a significant positive effect, but had high levels of industry involvement, weak and incomplete scientific reporting and methodology, and was not peer-reviewed prior to publication. Thus, the findings are unreliable. The final study, which was a quasi-experimental, fixed treatment order, controlled trial, found a positive effect of environmentally applied Valerian (on its own) on behaviour in shelter dogs. However, experimental design limited interpretation of the findings in relation to canine stress reduction, and external validity in relation to applicability to Pet Remedy use is weak.
 Where used as an adjunct, Pet Remedy is unlikely to do any direct animal welfare harm and may have a positive effect, based on studies that have unreliable findings and/or low external validity. However, unless further high quality research demonstrates a positive effect of Pet Remedy, veterinary professionals should be cautious about recommending it as an alternative to options with a stronger evidentiary basis, or as a delay to seeking more extensive professional support where needed. There is a need for further research to examine the efficacy of Pet Remedy on behavioural and physiological indices of canine stress reduction across a range of common stressful scenarios to further support veterinary professional decision making.
 
Highlights
Dogs that were aggressive to strangers or too anxious to handle safely were excluded from the trial
Subjective measures: 1. Behaviour score The median behaviour score for the placebo group was: January: 1 [1] February: 2 [1,2,3] March: 3 [2,3,4] April: 3.5 (2.5–4.5) The median behaviour score for the Pet Remedy group was: January: 1 ( 1–1) February: 2.5 ( 1–3) March: 3 (1.5–4) April: 4 [2,3,4,5] A statistically significant difference was observed between the placebo and Pet Remedy treatment groups in February (P = 0.0011), March (P = 0.0070) and April (P = 0.0047) the 95% confidence interval associated with the change in behaviour level seen by each month was 0.0– -1.0
Of the two directly using Pet Remedy, one found no efficacy of Pet Remedy in a stressed dog sample (Taylor and Madden, 2016) and the other found that it was efficacious at improving behaviour/reducing excitability in a sample of dogs that might be stressed (Unex Designs Ltd. 2014)
Summary
Clinical Scenario During veterinary clinics, you find that clients are asking you about a herbal diffuser, Pet Remedy, that they have seen marketed in pet shops and online, as a method to reduce stress levels in dogs and make them calmer. The evidence Three studies were included in this Knowledge Summary, of which one found no efficacy of Pet Remedy in a stressed dog sample (Taylor and Madden, 2016), one found that it was efficacious at improving behaviour/reducing excitability in a sample of dogs that might be stressed (Unex Designs Ltd., 2014), and one found a significant positive effect of Valerian alone (not as part of the Pet Remedy product) that might reflect lowered stress levels (Binks et al, 2018). This study contained insufficient experimental detail to fully appraise key aspects of the study design (including the method of delivering Pet Remedy or what the placebo was, essential sample population details or behavioural protocols used), and the findings for most outcome measures were not reported
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have