Does on-site computed tomography matter? A cross-sectional study of stroke patients' door-to-scan-time in rural hospitals.

Abstract

Many rural Australian hospitals lack on-site computed tomography (CT). These hospitals often refer patients to local off-site private radiology clinics or to central hospitals, challenging the achievement of time-sensitive scans. For stroke patients, timely access to CT affects treatment options. This study questions whether on-site CT matters in rural hospitals by investigating stroke patients' door-to-scan-time (DTST) and CT scan sequence referrals. A retrospective chart audit was completed across four rural hospitals; two with on-site CT and two without. Adult emergency stroke presentations were randomly sampled. Comparisons between on-site and off-site CT hospitals were made for DTST and CT sequence referrals using Mann-Whitney U-tests and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 120 charts were audited (on-site CT, n = 60; off-site CT, n = 60). DTST was longer for off-site vs. on-site CT hospitals (median = 4.30 h vs. median = 0.70 h; U = 338, p < 0.001) regardless of whether presentations occurred in business hours or out of hours (p < 0.001). Off-site CT hospitals ordered less CT angiography or perfusion scanning (32% vs. 85%, p < 0.001). Off-site CT hospital patients had longer DTST and received less angiography or perfusion scanning. These findings suggest that on-site CT matters to rural stroke patients by improving equitable access to CT and appropriate scan referrals.