Abstract

We use panel data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) administered among 1200 smallholders in Uganda to evaluate input use and food security impacts of an improved maize storage technology. After two seasons, households who received the technology were 10 percentage points more likely to plant hybrid maize varieties that are more susceptible to insect pests in storage than traditional lower-yielding varieties. Treated smallholders also stored maize for a longer period, reported a substantial drop in storage losses, and were less likely to use storage chemicals than untreated cohorts. Our results indicate that policies to promote soft kernel high-yielding hybrid maize varieties in sub-Saharan Africa should consider an improvement in post-harvest storage as a complementary intervention to increase adoption of these varieties.

Highlights

  • Many poverty alleviation and development programs implemented in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) focus on increasing agricultural production and smallholder productivity, frequently by encouraging smallholders to increase their use of improved seed varieties and chemical fertilizer (Evenson and Gollin, 2003; Pingali, 2012)

  • Results from our study indicate that households treated with the improved storage technology are 10 percentage points more likely to plant hybrid maize seed varieties the following year, consistent with observational findings reported by Ricker-Gilbert and Jones (2015) in Malawi

  • Thereafter, we present the main results on input use, examine whether the intervention changed storage behaviors and reported losses as speculated in our causal pathways, and perform robustness checks on the main results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many poverty alleviation and development programs implemented in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) focus on increasing agricultural production and smallholder productivity, frequently by encouraging smallholders to increase their use of improved seed varieties and chemical fertilizer (Evenson and Gollin, 2003; Pingali, 2012). Issues relating to post-harvest losses have not been considered in studies that evaluate the adoption of improved inputs such as seed and inorganic fertilizer among smallholder farm households. Results from our study indicate that households treated with the improved storage technology are 10 percentage points more likely to plant hybrid maize seed varieties the following year (significant with pvalue

Maize production
Post-harvest storage losses in maize
Maize storage technologies
Sampling
Testing for potential attrition bias
Causal pathways
Empirical framework
Sampling weights
Multiple hypothesis testing
Results and discussion
Baseline randomization balance checks
Improved maize variety adoption
Share of area planted to improved seed varieties
Fertilizer use
Results for intermediate outcomes
Quantity of maize stored
Length of storage for consumption and sales
Storage chemical use
6.10. Storage losses
Robustness checks
Conclusions and policy recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call