Abstract
BackgroundImplementation of office-based addiction treatment (OBAT) by nurse care managers increases overall use of OUD medication, but it is unknown whether it increases treatment duration among treated patients. MethodsThe Primary Care Opioid Use Disorders Treatment (PROUD) trial was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial testing whether implementation of OBAT increased OUD treatment in 12 primary care clinics in 6 systems. One of 2 clinics per system was randomized to implement OBAT (intervention), the other, usual care (UC). We evaluated treatment duration for the 3 years after nurses began seeing patients at clinics randomized to intervention vs. UC. The primary sample included patients newly initiating OUD medication; the secondary sample included patients with ongoing OUD medication. The primary outcome was percentage of days with OUD medications after treatment initiation, modeled using linear generalized estimating equations (GEE). Modified Poisson GEE models assessed secondary outcomes (≥80% of days covered, ≥6 months on treatment). ResultsIn adjusted analyses, the mean difference between intervention and UC in percent days treated was 6.3% (95% CI -9.6%, 22.1%) in the primary sample and 2.3% (95% CI -36.4%, 31.8%) in the secondary sample. There was no significant difference in treatment duration between intervention and UC patients in either primary or secondary outcomes. ConclusionsImplementation of OBAT in this trial did not measurably increase duration of medication treatment among those treated for OUD compared to UC, suggesting that benefits of OBAT, at least in this trial, largely reflect increases in treatment access.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.