Abstract
PurposeThe primary outcome measure of this study was to determine the effect of hamstring graft size on the functional outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) and the secondary outcome was to ascertain the effect on revision surgery at the two-year follow-up.MethodsThis is a prospective comparative study of 144 consecutive patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft. All patients underwent graft harvesting and ACL reconstruction with the standard technique. The graft diameter was recorded intraoperatively using a graft sizer. All patients were followed up with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) recorded at preop, six weeks, six months, one year, and two years and whether they underwent revision during this period was documented.ResultsThe mean KOOS for patients with a ≤ 7mm graft diameter was 80.5±13.1, which was significantly lower compared to those with graft > 7 mm of 88.3±8.5, respectively (p<0.001) at the two years follow-up. Patients with graft ≤ 7mm did poorly, especially with mean KOOS subscores of sports and recreation and quality of life (p<0.05). Twenty-three point one percent (23.1%; 3 out 13) of patients with a graft < 7mm underwent revision, whereas only 5.8% and 2.6% of patients underwent revision with a graft diameter of 7.1-8.0 and 8.1-9.0 (p=0.027).ConclusionsThe smaller Hamstring graft diameter leads to poorer functional outcomes of the patient’s ACL reconstruction. Though the number of revisions was high among those with a graft diameter of ≤ 7mm, multicentric studies with many revisions are required to confirm the relation.
Highlights
The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries has increased, and its surgical reconstruction has become a routinely practiced procedure worldwide by many orthopedic surgeons over the past two decades [1,2]
Twenty-three point one percent (23.1%; 3 out 13) of patients with a graft < 7mm underwent revision, whereas only 5.8% and 2.6% of patients underwent revision with a graft diameter of 7.1-8.0 and 8.1-9.0 (p=0.027)
Even with a well-documented success rate, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) surgery has witnessed pitfalls, as many patients undergoing the procedure must invest a significant amount of time and effort for rehabilitation especially in those involved in sports activities [7,8]
Summary
The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries has increased, and its surgical reconstruction has become a routinely practiced procedure worldwide by many orthopedic surgeons over the past two decades [1,2]. Various graft options exist for ACL reconstruction like hamstring, bone-patellar tendon, quadriceps, etc., and multiple factors influence finalizing the decision of the ideal graft choice for the patient. It depends on whether the graft can re-create the anatomical and biomechanical properties of the native ligament, assures safer fixation, faster biological integration, and minimal donor site morbidity. The advantages of hamstring graft are that it is easy to harvest and has good strength with lower donor site morbidity
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
