Does Functional Status Predict Worse 30-D Outcomes in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms? A Propensity-Score Matched Study From ACS-NSQIP Targeted Database From 2012 to 2022

Abstract

IntroductionIn patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), existing studies have identified an association between dependent functional status (DFS) and poorer outcomes after EVAR. However, noted limitations, especially the lack of differentiation between ruptured and nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), potentially affect the extrapolation of these findings to specific patient groups. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between functional status and 30-d outcomes after EVAR in ruptured and nonruptured AAA patients separately. MethodsPatients who underwent infrarenal EVAR were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2012-2022. Patients with DFS and those with independent functional status (IFS) were stratified into the two study cohorts. In nonruptured AAA, a 1:1 propensity-score matching was used to address demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distal extent of the aneurysm, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures between patients with DFS and IFS. The sample size for ruptured patients with AAA was too small for meaningful statistical analysis so only qualitative description was provided. Thirty-d postoperative mortality and morbidities of EVAR were assessed. ResultsFor nonruptured cases, there were 380 (2.55%) DFS and 14,545 (97.45%) patients with IFS, where 453 patients with IFS were matched to the DFS cohort. For ruptured AAA, there were 17 (6.39%) DFS and 249 (93.61%) IFS. After matching, nonruptured DFS and patients with IFS had similar 30-d mortality rates (2.37% vs 2.11%, P = 1.00). However, patients with DFS had a higher risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (18.42% vs 11.84%, P = 0.01) and longer length of stay (median 3.00 [Q1 1.00, Q3 6.00] vs median 2.00 [Q1 1.00, Q3 4.00] d, P < 0.01). All other outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac complications, stroke, pulmonary complications, renal complications, sepsis, venous thromboembolism, wound complications, lower extremity ischemia, ischemic colitis, postoperative ruptured aneurysm, unplanned reoperation, 30-d readmission, were not different between patients with DFS and IFS. Qualitatively, ruptured patients with DFS had higher crude rates of 30-d mortality and morbidities compared to patients with IFS. ConclusionsContrary to previous literature, patients with DFS with nonruptured AAA undergoing EVAR were found to have largely comparable outcomes to patients with IFS, although extra attention should be paid to postoperative bleeding.