Abstract

In a recent debate over the radio in Botswana on the death penalty, the majority of callers seemed to be in favour of the death penalty. The purpose of this paper is to clarify that capital punishment is cruel, inhuman and degrading contrary to the norms set out in the Convention against Torture, the optional protocol to the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) on the abolition of the death penalty. The methodology of this paper is to invoke the South African sentiment and international treaties to buttress the notion that death penalty amounts to the taking of a human life and is tantamount to the infringement of basic human right to life as enshrined in both the Botswana and the South African Constitution. South Africa heeded to this call and abolished capital punishment, whereas Botswana not only includes capital punishment in its constitution, but couched this form of punishment in a mandatory fashion. In the Botswana case of Ntesang v State however, the decision of execution by hanging attests to the cruelty and inhumanity of capital punishment. Under the influence of international treaties and conventions the particular judge in this case invited the state to outlaw the death penalty. The judge warned though, that the judiciary cannot rewrite the Constitution. The legislature can do it as it is the arm of government vested with law making powers. In order to materialize such a venture, Botswana must also take into account international treaties and conventions in the interpretation of its domestic legislation. Although Botswana does that, as seen in the light of section 24 of the Interpretations Act and the Unity Dow-case, it is done in a cursorily fashion. For this reason, Botswana has also to consider the South African stand on the death penalty. South African case law is not binding but merely persuasive. The South African position is the most appropriate model of comparison, seeing from the fact that capital punishment was also exerted during the apart-regime. The subsequent abolishment of capital under the new regime must served as a harbinger for Botswana to follow in the footsteps of its neigbour (South Africa).

Highlights

  • 1.1 Mandatory Nature of Capital PunishmentA constitution limits the power of the government in two ways

  • The methodology of this paper is to invoke the South African sentiment and international treaties to buttress the notion that death penalty amounts to the taking of a human life and is tantamount to the infringement of basic human right to life as enshrined in both the Botswana and the South African Constitution

  • By committing itself to a society founded on the recognition of human rights South Africans are required to value the right to life above all others

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Mandatory Nature of Capital PunishmentA constitution limits the power of the government in two ways. It imposes structural and procedural limitations on the exercise of power and secondly, only through the operation of a Bill of Rights, may substantive limitations be imposed The latter notion, which is of more concern to this research, entails that the state may not use its power in such a way as to violate any of a list of fundamental human rights of its citizenry and that it has a corresponding duty to use its power to protect and promote these rights. It means that the state should even refuse to destroy the life of criminals (Note 1)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.