Abstract
Abstract In a recent article I. J. Good has used Bayesian methods to conclude that there is strong evidence in favor of the validity of Bode's law. Here we reanalyze the observed planetary distances using non-Bayesian significance testing procedures, and reach the opposite conclusion. The three purposes of this article are (1) to reexamine the validity of Bode's law; (2) to develop some insight into the more general problem of testing whether or not an observed sequence of numbers follows some simple rule; and (3) to discuss the philosophical basis of Fisherian significance testing. It is not intended to provide an example of disagreement between Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods. Rather the two analyses are seen to be similar in execution, the different conclusions arising from different choices of the statistical models.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
