Does a surgical access for rectal cancer in older patients affect postoperative morbidity and oncological safety?

Abstract

AIM: to evaluate the effect of a surgical access on postoperative morbidity and oncological safety in older patients.PATIENTS AND METHODS: a multicenter retrospective study included 179 patients aged 60–74 years who underwent surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (T1-3N0-N2bM0) in 2021-2023. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the first ones underwent robotic (ROB) surgery (n = 62), the second — laparoscopic (LAP) surgery (n = 55), and the third — open (OPEN) surgery (n = 62). Parameters of pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods and histopathological findings were evaluated. Neural network modeling was used to predict anastomotic leakage (AL).RESULTS: the blood loss was 150 (100; 200) ml with OPEN versus 100 (50; 100) with ROB and LAP, the operation time was 255 (210; 300) min with ROB versus 180 (150; 240) min with LAP and 140 (120; 150) min with OPEN. In ROB and LAP groups, anastomoses were formed in 61 (98.4%) and 54 (98.2%) cases compared with 45 (72.6%) cases in the OPEN group (p = 0.00001). The splenic flexure was mobilized in 54 (98.2%) cases in the LAP group, 55 (88.7%) cases in the OPEN group, and 50 (80.7%) cases in the ROB group (p = 0.01). Conversion rates were 10.9% (6/55) and 1.6% (1/62) in LAP and ROB groups, respectively (p = 0.00001). Postoperative complications in the OPEN group occurred in 48 (77.4%) cases compared with 31 (50%) and 12 (21.8%) in ROB and LAP groups (p = 0.02). Inflammatory complications predominated in the OPEN group. Distal and lateral margins, the quality of mesorectal excision, and the number of examined and affected lymph nodes did not differ. However, the good quality of mesorectal excision prevailed in ROB and OPEN groups, where as the satisfactory quality was more common in the LAP group. The most important predictors of AL were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, stage I and IIa cancer, end-to-end anastomosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of 3–4, and surgeon’s experience (20–40 operations for rectal cancer per year). The least important predictors were the level of mesenteric vessel ligation and the access.CONCLUSIONS: the surgical access does not affect the AL rate. The histology revealed that all the 3 approaches ensure compliance with principles of oncological safety. Compared with open surgery, robotic and laparoscopic surgery result in less blood loss and faster recovery of intestinal function; however, the operation time increases.