“Doctor, What Would You do if You Were Me?” - A Survey of Physician Perspectives Toward Glioblastoma Resection

Abstract

How maximal safe resection (MSR) of glioblastoma is implemented in the clinical setting remains understudied. Here, we utilized a survey-based approach to understand physician perspectives on this matter. Scenarios involving glioblastomas were presented to physicians who were asked to select from planned sub-total resection (STR), gross total resection (GTR), medical therapy only, or palliative care. Demographic, experience, and Likert scales of value assessment were collected. In the scenario involving a corpus callosum glioblastoma, 2.33% opted for GTR. For a right frontal glioblastoma, 91.7% opted for GTR. In contrast, only 30.8% chose GTR of a right motor strip glioblastoma (p< 0.001). When presented with a left motor strip glioblastoma, fewer respondents (12.7%,p < 0.001) opted for GTR. Physicians who placed a high value on preserving physical independence were more likely to forgo GTR for right motor glioblastomas (HR=0.068,95% CI:0.47-0.97,p=0.035), and physicians who placed a high value on their faith were more likely to opt for surgical treatments that differ from the general consensus, for instance opting for GTR of the corpus callosum glioblastoma (HR=4.18,95%CI:1.63-10.74,p=0.003). No other associations were found between the choice for GTR and other variables collected. Our results suggest that while maximal safe resection remains a guiding principle for glioblastoma resection, physician preference in terms of the extent of resection varies significantly as a function of tumor location and personal values.