Abstract
This study sets out to provide a test of echoic mention theory, which predicts that irony and sarcasm are most easily comprehended by a listener when the speaker explicitly ‘echoes’ a previous utterance or some shared norm rather than when the speaker only implicitly alludes to the same information. Children aged 6‐10 years were given stories containing either a sarcastic comment that explicitly echoed an earlier remark, a sarcastic comment that only implicitly alluded to an earlier remark, or a literal comment from a speaker. Half of the children heard the stories presented with a sarcastic intonation and half heard the stories presented with an uninflected intonation. The results of the study showed that when vocal intonation was absent, children comprehended explicit stories better than implicit stories. The findings suggest that echoic mention theory is a useful theory for describing children's developing comprehension of sarcastic speech, but is only one of many factors that play a role in the comprehension process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.