Abstract

Gilovich ( Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 59-74, 1987) argued that people (tellers) transmitting information about a target person′s reprehensible behavior to a second party (listeners) omit information about situational causes for such behavior. Moreover, because these mitigating circumstances are omitted (or masked), listeners make more extreme (positive and negative) judgments of the target person than tellers do. The two present studies show that this teller-listener extremity effect is very robust but is not mediated by the teller′s tendency to omit (mask) either situational information (as Gilovich argued) or stylistic information about the target person′s level of remorse. Rather, the data suggest that most situational information is transmitted, but the listeners do not weigh this information as heavily as tellers when forming impressions about the target person.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.