Abstract

We analyze whether soliciting multiple ratings leads to lower syndicated loan spreads. Our results document that banks apply, on average, lower spreads to multi-rated firms. This effect depends on the reduction of information asymmetry about borrowers’ creditworthiness (information production hypothesis) and on the benefits in regulatory terms (regulatory certification hypothesis). In addition, consistent with the rating shopping hypothesis, we find that banks price the risk that borrowers shopped for better ratings, especially in crisis periods. Our results also hold when considering crisis periods, the unobserved heterogeneity of lenders, the use of rating-based pricing, and adopting a matched sample.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.