Abstract

We analyse whether soliciting multiple ratings leads to lower syndicated loan spreads. Our results document that banks apply, on average, lower spreads to multi-rated firms. This effect depends on the reduction of information asymmetry about borrowers’ creditworthiness (information production hypothesis) and on the benefits in regulatory terms (regulatory certification hypothesis). In addition, consistent with the rating shopping hypothesis, we find that banks price the risk that borrowers shopped for better ratings, especially in crisis times. Our results also hold taking into account crisis periods, the unobserved heterogeneity of lenders, the use of rating-based pricing, and adopting a matched sample.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call