Abstract

Objective To determine the morphological features in the anterior mandibular region, the presence of lingual foramen and canal dimensions in Saudi subjects that would interfere with standard implant placement. Methods CBCT scans of patients seeking implant treatment were examined. Based on the dentition status, patients were categorized into edentulous (group I) and dentulous (group I). On the panoramic view, the distance between the two mental foramina was divided into vertical segments of 10 mm width. In each segment, vertical bone height and buccolingual thickness at three levels (alveolar crest, 5 mm, and 10 mm apical to the crest) were assessed. The lingual foramen prevalence and canal features were assessed as well. Comparisons between the two groups regarding the assessed parameters were performed using the t-test. The percentage of edentulous mandibles with thickness <6 mm corresponding to the standard implant diameter was also calculated. Results Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, group I consisted of 45 subjects and group II comprised 26 subjects. Bone height and thickness at the crestal level were significantly less in edentulous (I) than dentate mandibles (II) (P < 0.0001). The lingual foramen was detected in 90% of patients. In both groups, males had significantly greater mandibular height than females (P=0.02 and 0.005). At the crestal level, the thickness was <6 mm in 50% of the anterior mandibular segments. Conclusion Half of the edentulous patients may receive normal size implants in the anterior interforaminal segments, while the other half will be limited to narrow implants (3.5 mm and less). The lingual foramen location, canal size, and position may represent another limitation for implant placement in that segment.

Highlights

  • Tooth loss results in partial or complete edentulousness. e percentage of edentulous patients is still high in many countries even with all the attempts to reduce tooth loss [1]

  • Methods and Materials is cross-sectional study involved Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images taken for the patients who visited the periodontology and prosthodontics dental clinic of IAU from January 2018 to January 2019 for dental implant treatment

  • Considering the alveolar crest thickness, implant placement in the posterior interforaminal segments would be safe for 75% of edentulous patients, whereas placing implants in the anterior segments may not be safe for 50%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tooth loss results in partial or complete edentulousness. e percentage of edentulous patients is still high in many countries even with all the attempts to reduce tooth loss [1]. Tooth loss results in partial or complete edentulousness. E percentage of edentulous patients is still high in many countries even with all the attempts to reduce tooth loss [1]. Conventional removable complete or partial dentures are commonly used to restore missing teeth. Reduced retention and stability of conventional mandibular denture are frequently seen in patients with significant ridge resorption [2]. Erefore, hybrid solutions and implantsupported overdenture may be a suitable treatment choice for patients having edentulous mandibles [2, 4]. Treatment planning, placement, and restoration of dental implants for dentate and edentulous patients can be challenging. Insufficient bone height or width and the approximation to mental or lingual foramina are obstacles that face clinicians when placing an implant in the anterior mandibular region [5, 6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call