Abstract

In the present study, we investigate the impact of discounts on the valuation performance of initial public offerings. Review of existing literature reveals that such valuation performance lacks examination in terms of discounts as most studies focus on valuation methods. Accordingly, we examine the valuation performance of initial public offerings before and after applying discounts. Whereby, underwriters apply a deliberate discount to fair value estimate before setting the final offer price. We assess the valuation performance of initial public offerings through bias and accuracy errors as well as explainability. When valuation errors are low, the valuation performance is deemed superior. Our sample consists of 39 initial public offerings conducted on the Moroccan stock exchange between 2004 and 2018. We use publicly available prospectus to collect necessary data. Our results reveal that discounts applied to fair value estimate when setting the final offer price reduce valuation errors. Consequently, discounts enhance the valuation performance of initial public offerings. In fact, both optimistic and pessimistic final offer price are closer to market price in comparison with optimistic and pessimistic fair value estimate. We conclude that if valuations conducted by underwriters are objective, discounts serve as a qualitative valuation to supplement the quantitative one. This qualitative valuation incorporates relevant information about market circumstances with regard to initial public offerings. This indicates the superior fundamental analysis underwriters are capable of performing. However, if valuations conducted by underwriters are subjective, then underwriters deliberately overestimates fair value estimate to justify applying discounts when setting the final offer price. Nonetheless, our study reveals that discounts are more than proportional to valuation optimism. Consequently, while discounts absorb this valuation optimism, they also set a valuation pessimism. In other words, discounts avoid overpricing initial public offerings, yet they result in underpricing them. Interestingly, we discover that although optimistic fair value estimate and pessimistic final offer price have approximate valuation errors, underwriters are more comfortable underpricing initial public offerings than overpricing them.

Highlights

  • Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) mark a crucial step in a firm’s lifespan, yet setting the offer price is beset by several challenges

  • Our study reveals that discounts are more than proportional to valuation optimism

  • While discounts absorb this valuation optimism, they set a valuation pessimism, which results in IPOs underpricing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) mark a crucial step in a firm’s lifespan, yet setting the offer price is beset by several challenges. IPOs valuation process as documented by Roosenboom (2012) starts with individual estimates produced by each valuation method used. Fair value estimate (FVE) is computed as the weighted average of all individual estimates. Preliminary offer price (POP) is computed by applying discount. Final offer price (FOP) is set by incorporating price updates. It is worth noting that these updates are applicable for bookbuilding offerings only. POP and FOP are identical for fixed priced offerings as they are not subject to price updates, which is the case of our study.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call