Abstract

This study aims to examine whether two country characteristics—book-tax conformity and law enforcement—affect the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness. Previous studies have produced inconclusive results for the relationship between financial and tax aggressiveness. This study fills the gap by examining the country-level determinants of the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness. It also develops a new measure of the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness. Using a sample of firms from 15 countries in East Asia and Europe from 2014 to 2016, this study finds that firms from countries with higher book-tax conformity and stronger law enforcement tend to have a lower complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness. In an additional test, this study shows that in countries with lower book-tax conformity, the effect of law enforcement on the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness is stronger than in countries with higher book-tax conformity. These results suggest that country characteristics influence managers’ decisions to either present financial statements and tax reporting aggressively at the same time or not.

Highlights

  • This study examines the impact of two country characteristics—book-tax conformity and law enforcement—on the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness

  • In testing H2, this study suspects that firms from countries with stronger law enforcement tend to engage in a lower complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness

  • This study has examined the impact of two country characteristics—book-tax conformity and law enforcement—on complementary levels of financial and tax aggressiveness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study examines the impact of two country characteristics—book-tax conformity and law enforcement—on the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness. Financial accounting standards (in this context the International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS) allow firms to choose the accounting methods they use to estimate their accruals (Subramanyam, 1996). This flexibility can in turn affect the earnings quality of firms. On the other hand, is conducted with the aim of raising the utility of insider parties through earnings after tax distribution, such as bonuses or dividends (Kim, Li, & Zhang, 2011), to increase cash flow efficiency (Mills, 1998), and to alleviate financial constraints (Edwards, Schwab, & Shevlin, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call