Abstract
This meta-analysis of 54 empirical studies examines the determinants of natural hedging. Our findings reveal that firm's risk exposure, economies of scale, and strategic considerations prompt natural hedge. Financial distress and underinvestment theory also partially explain the preference for natural hedge; however, their effect's economic relevance is low. Factors influencing natural hedging differ across geographical regions and impact the choice of natural hedging strategies. For instance, highly profitable firms prefer foreign debt, whereas highly leveraged firms prefer operational modifications as natural hedge strategy. Data sources, model specifications, econometric methods, and journal rankings further explain heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
