Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate commonly used cancer websites’ information provision, we developed and applied an Information Comprehensiveness Tool to breast and prostate cancer websites. MethodsWe first collated questions from a systematic literature review on patient information needs. We then classified the questions in terms of spectrum of care, theme, and nature of question. “Breast cancer” and “prostate cancer” were typed into Google, and websites listed on the first page of results were selected. Two researchers, blind to each others’ scores, assessed the same websites using the coding system. Each question was scored on a 3-point scale as not (0%), partially (50%) and fully (100%) answered by two researchers. Average scores were calculated across all questions. Inter-rater reliability was assessed. ResultsWe identified 79 general, 5 breast, and 5 prostate cancer questions. Inter-rater reliability was good, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.756 (95% CIs 0.729–0.781). 17 questions were not answered thoroughly by any website. Questions about “future planning”, “monitoring”, and “decision-making” were discussed least. Biomedical questions scored highest. ConclusionsMore comprehensive information needs to be provided on breast and prostate cancer websites. Practice implicationsThis ICT can improve cancer information online and enable patients to engage more actively regarding their information needs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
